|
Anaerobic
Reflections of Eternal Moral Gravity:
Quid
Scimus De Quid Nescimus1
by
Dallas
F. Bell, Jr.
“A
wise man scales the city of the mighty and brings down
the
strength of their confidence.”2--Solomon
The
Congregationalist minister, Edward Hale, wrote of a double in his My
Double and How He Undid Me.
The image of an object by reflection is its mirror image in the axis
or plane of reflection: the mirror image, p, of a reflection with
respect to a vertical axis, q, or a horizontal axis, b. In
mathematics, an involutory function or self-inverse function, f,
is its own inverse for all x in the domain of f.
Apply two times and it is the original value: f : x → x, thus f
(f
(x))
= x. (See endnote 4 for a discussion of gas, liquid, and plasma
related mirrors.)
Reflections
may be aerobic, with air, meaning requiring the physics of this
tangible finite material universe, or may be anaerobic, without
air, meaning it does not need the physics of this material universe.
It is the instinct of humans to track the passage of moments with a
tangible devise called a clock.3
If we make an exact mirror opposite of a digital clock, including
the reversal of numbers and all circuitry it would not be harmonious
with the electric supply. The hot and neutral connections in the
outlet would have a reversed polarity causing possible shocks and
fire, etc. The purpose of the created clock by an intellect includes
the functional symmetry with its surroundings.
Likewise,
we know that the biology of a frog needs the digesting enzymes of its
food to survive. If it were possible to make a DNA mirror of a frog
it would die because it could not turn eaten flies, etc. into energy.
Therefore, the symmetry of the frog and its surroundings dictate it
was created by a pre-existing intellect for a purpose within this
tangible universe.
Mirroring
technology and biology includes their complete or near complete
working knowledge. That allows the prioritization for disruption
operations by righteous and unrighteous individuals and institutions.
In 2022, the Defense Sciences Office (DSO) of the U.S. Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) sought to accelerate
investments in their “Disruptioneering” program to explore novel
materials and structures, sensing and measurement, computation and
processing, enabling operations, collective intelligence, and global
change.4
Richard
Feynman noted the physical laws of reflection include geography,
chemistry, philosophy, life, and history etc.5
It was just discovered in the 1800’s that snowflakes have six
points. Then, it is important to understand how finite intellects
know. First is observation, e.g. two apples are on a table. Second
is deduction, e.g. there are not three apples on the table. Third is
revelation, e.g. the neighbor said they saw two apples on the table.
Fourth is testing, e.g. have other people see if two apples are on
the table.
Sylvain
Bromberger’s (1992) writing “on what we know we don’t know”6
indicates the necessity of understanding what we know about what we
do not know (quid
scimus de quid nescimus).
The apostle Paul wrote that for now we see in a mirror (riddle)
darkly (dimly), but then face to face; now I know in part, but then I
will know fully just as I also have been fully known.7
Reflections
often refer to neurological thoughts recalling events.8
Alfred Lord Tennyson’s Ode
to Memory
says “O strengthen me, enlighten me!” Li Bai’s (also Li Pai or
Li Po) Reflections
in a Quite Night
tells how he thinks of home.9
The Hebrew king, Solomon wrote as in water face reflects face so the
heart of man reflects man.10
Robert Stevenson’s Looking-Glass
River
also indicates water reflections. Sylvia Plath’s Mirror
speaks of the flat surfaces of mirrors and lakes only being capable
of reflecting back exactly the truth of what it “sees,” even the
bad, as Walt Whitman’s A
Hand-Mirror
does. Thomas Hardy’s I
Look into my Glass
focuses on ageing.11
Christina Rossette’s Passing
and Glassing
shows the evidence of the passing of time. William Shakespeare’s
sonnet 3 says “Look in the glass and tell the face thou viewist”12
as an encouragement to do something.
The
Hebrew king, David’s psalm to God says “...eagerly utter the
memory of Your abundant goodness and will shout joyfully of Your
righteousness.”13
C. S. Lewis’ (1950) essay Historicism
warned historians of pretending to know the hand of God (providence)
in all history. Augustine, Dante, Hegel, and Marx etc. thought they
understood the cause and effect of all history. Hebert Butterfield’s
(1958) essay God
in History
argued God is not outside of history (human understanding of
providence) or else humans could not have a relationship with Him.
The
innate need to not be lied to, stolen from, or murdered causes all
intellects to desire justice, love, and merciful redemption etc.,
which prompts the question of symmetrical purpose. That creates a
demand to a supplied theology that answers that need. A crisis, e.g.
a terminal health issue etc., can increase demand as well as someone
pointing out that need, e.g. Jonathan Edwards’ sermon Sinners
in the Hand of an Angry God
which caused the American Great Wakening etc.
The
mathematics of supply (s) and demand (d) quantity (Q) based on
Christian theology (t) may be represented by an equilibrium of Qst =
Qdt and an increased demand, as in the Great Awakening, Qdt > Qst
= + Qst, and a decreased demand, as in the U.S. and world today, Qst
> Qdt = - Qst.
Plato
wrote “death, as it seems to me, is actually nothing but the
disconnection of two things, the soul14
and the body, from each other.”15
In Albert Einstein’s (1932) My
Credo,
he explained “our situation on this earth seems strange. Every one
of us appears here involuntarily and uninvited for a short stay,
without knowing the whys and the wherefore.”16
The
Bible begins with the book of Genesis addressing life (Adam etc.) and
ending with death (Joseph etc.) and the final biblical book begins
with death (Jesus’ redemptive sacrifice) and ends with life in
heaven (for the redeemed). Solomon explained the righteous has a
refuge when he dies17
and surely there is a hereafter.18
Death is understood as a separation (Greek chōres,
space or apart from) now from the body19
and from God20
and in the future second death from God.21
Finite
humans neurologically know by recognizing nouns and verbs at birth
and, as previously covered, innately do not want to be lied to,
stolen from or murdered. It is also innately recognized that
justice, love and merciful redemption requires the existence of an
eternal afterlife and it is observed that this life was created by a
just Being with symmetry that requires an eternal afterlife.
Deduction means there must be life after death. Revelation would
include eternal life for the forgiven just in heaven and eternal hell
for the unforgiven unjust seen in biblical scripture. The tested
theory of biblical truth includes the truth that none does good and
all need redemptive truth. Neurologically, it is obvious that there
must be an eternal reward for the forgiven of evil and for the
unforgiven evil, and the seeking of the pre-existing creator
Redeemer.
Therefore,
there is a high probability that there is an eternal afterlife of
heaven and hell. The Christian who combined the laws of electricity
and magnetism with the laws of the behavior of light22
and rejector of the false theology of evolution, James Maxwell is
often quoted as having observed that “The true logic of this world
is in the calculus of probabilities, which takes account of the
magnitude of the probability which is, or ought to be, in a
reasonable man’s mind.” Thus, a definitive comparative
theological supply for the common theological demand may be pursued,
especially regarding the afterlife.
The
theological supply for mankind’s theological demand must be either
filled by the infinite true God of good or the finite false god of
evil. All theological suppliers address not only the God of good but
the god of evil. For example, evil is recognized in Japanese
architecture.
In
the photo above, the ancient Yomeimon main gate (Japanese mon
means
gate, of sun-light) of Nikkō (means sun-light),23
Japan, has Chinese influenced carved columns, e.g. images of dragon
heads etc., which are symmetrical except for one which was
intentionally carved upside down to avoid being so perfect as to
offend jealous divine spirits.24
The dragon is a biblical name for Satan25
who is transformed into an angel (demon) of light,26
also called Lucifer, the Morning Star,27
and ruler of darkness.28
The
psychology of the Shinto (Confucianism-Buddhism) Japanese theology
may be seen in the collection of seven short stories (1974-1981) by
Kenji Nakagami titled Snakelust
(Jain).
They all revolve around death (e.g. the book’s name sake story of
“Snakelust” is about parental murder), and include demon
deception and the perception that people are part of an accumulation,
not separate individuals. Nakagami was of the underclass Burakumin
(meaning hamlet, village people) condemned to do Kegare
(meaning defilement) unclean work in the Tokugawa
feudal class system. Japanese beliefs may also be seen in the poems
of Shuntarō Tanigawa’s Akatsuchi
no le
(Red Clay House), such as in the Song
of the Jelly Fish:
“Me? What am I as a thing of emptiness, you know, emptiness swayed
by the wages...” Ryuichi Tamura wrote of a “Zen temple” in The
Thin Line Again
and the “way of death is small insects” in The
World With No Words.
Mitsuhara Kaneko’s, who attended Catholic school in Toyoko, book
Two
Billion Light Years of Solitude
includes ...many of us are generated... in Museum.
Machi Tawara, a tanka poet, also represents Shinto underpinnings in
her Salad
Anniversary.29
(Note: it is natural for the scientific structure, theomathēmatica,
of true systematic theology to be articulated with poetic
articulation as theopoetics, e.g. Asaph’s (Hebrew gather[er]) 12
psalms and Jesus’ Beatitudes etc. Unfortunately, legitimate poetic
license of anthropomorphizing the Divine and His creation is often
invaded by intentional heretical input, such as process theology
where God is not always eternal, immutable, or sovereign, which
mathematically fails to understand the infinite and holy set is
always complete by definition. Additionally, related narrative
theology also commonly errs by rejecting objective truth, which
expects that no truth is objectively true, in the biblical narrative
while embracing relativism, which expects that relativity’s
foundation is objectively true. Theopoetics should reflect humility
created from the incomprehensibility of infinite God revealed to
finite man in the necessary incremental biblical process.)
A
disciple of Lao-Tzu, Chuang-Tse (also Zhuang Zhou or Zhuangzi meaning
master) criticized Confucian’s social and political philosophy. In
section 6 (The Great Supreme: This human form is a source of joy, at
least to some) of his book The
Zhuangzi
(The Master) translated by Lin Yutang, Chuangtse pondered in the
relative terms of Taoism, “To Tao, the zenith is not high, nor the
nadir low; no point in time is long ago, nor by lapse of ages has it
grown old.” Yutang used that quote to begin Book I (The Daughters
of a Taoist) of his book Moment
in Peking.
A few decades later Yutang wrote From
Pagan to Christian
and died as member of a U.S. Presbyterian Church.
Buddhism
calls the realm of the dead (hell) Yan
Wang,
the king of the hell (Diyu)
in the afterlife (narak),
and heaven (tíen)
with heavenly spirit (Shang
Ti).
The theological concepts of yin and yang, or good (symmetrical
created order demonstrated earlier) and evil (unsymmetrical
disorder), are obviously false because evil does not have the ability
to be the First Causer of all effects, in that it is disorder, and so
is not equal to but is inferior to the Being of good. That truth may
also be applied to other false theologies, such as Mormonism were
Christ Jesus and Satan are believed to be brothers (equals): infinite
good ≠ finite evil.
In
Arthur Schopenhauer’s The
World as Will and Representation
(especially Book 2), indicates the world is beyond the aspect of what
appears to us with its inner essence containing will (Wille).
This incorrectly condemns human life to directionless
purposelessness. Einstein commented on this by saying, “A man can
do as he will, but not will as he will.”30
If the world has a will, then it has purpose. If it has purpose, it
has intellect. That intellect would have created the intellect of
humans, which would also have its reflected will and could not be
directionless or purposeless, thusly contradicting Schopenhauer’s,
and others, argument.
The
sin of the created finite indicates freewill to choose unsymmetrical
evil, the opposite of symmetrical good. Paul looked at both the sin
of the flesh and sin of the soul.31
The root of rebellion against God is in the flesh. Thomas Aquinas,
in his Summa
Theologica,
indicated the original sin is more flesh than soul because the
rebellion of the flesh arises from the corruption of the original
sin. The original sin is genetically passed down from fleshly
parents pre-existing and not the soul, which is uniquely new. The
soul leaves the body at death32
and is immortal (sinless in heaven where there is no sin).33
There is no good in the flesh34
and that which the soul would do it does not do because of the
flesh.35
All sin of the flesh and soul requires the society to address the
affronts against God with material punishment now.36
The
biblical list of the basic commands of good behavior and results of
evil behavior, as in the chart below, are the necessary fundamentals
of all jurisprudence and the building blocks of civil education.37
Speaker of eight languages and estimated to have the highest IQ of
any U.S. president,38
John Adams, U.S. ambassador, congressman, senator, secretary of
state, and president stated, “The law given from Sinai was a civil
and municipal [code] as well as a moral and religious code. These
are laws essential to the existence of men in society and most of
which have been enacted by every nation which ever professed any code
of laws.”39
Shakespeare’s Julius
Caesar
(Act 1, Scene 1; 66-67) has Flavius make an observation of generic
commoners, “See whe’er their basest mettle be not moved.
Tongue-tied in their guiltiness.” In verse 11 of the 86th
Psalm, David said the truth of God unites the heart to fear Him.
All
humans innately desire an existence of perpetual happiness. The
redeemed knowingly hope for a heavenly state where all of God’s
holy commandments for man’s well-being are harmoniously complied
with. The unredeemed unknowingly hope for a hellish state where all
of God’s commandments for man’s well-being are not harmoniously
complied with. For the unredeemed to achieve their desire of
violating all of God’s commandments means only one could have this
happiness and all others would be unwilling victims of that one’s
lies, theft, rape, and murder etc. When the U.S. founders created
the American constitutional government of ...all men are created
equal... and ...are free to pursue happiness...based on God’s
biblical standards, they knew it could be only for Christians who
seek compliance with God’s standards in this fallen world.
Societal violence and unsymmetrical disorder are the usual response
toward bearers of truth (e.g. Isaiah, Paul the Apostle, and Polycarp
etc.) even though societal acceptance and symmetrical order are
occasionally the case (e.g. Huldah, Jonah, and Jonathan Edwards
etc.).
Observable
behavioral compliance with the commandments may allow an estimation
of eternal moral problem solving IQ (mIQ). For example, based on
credible biographical data, the highest mIQ of U.S. presidents would
arguably be J. Q. Adams, followed by G. Washington, then A. Lincoln,
D. Eisenhour, R. Reagan, M. Fillmore, W. McKinley, J. Garfield, G.
Cleveland, and T. Roosevelt etc. With analysis of credible
unrepentant sins, the lowest mIQ would be B. Obama,40
then T. Jefferson,41
J. Biden,42
W. Clinton,43
R. Nixon,44
J Carter,45
A. Jackson,46
J. Kennedy,47
D. Trump,48
and F. Roosevelt49
etc.
The
unrepentant are as the famous picture of Oscar Wilde’s fictional
character, Dorian Gray. It depicted an eternally true reflection of
Dorian’s sinful state, observed by others, even though he saw
himself as sinfully pristine: f : x → x or f (f (x)) = x.
Self-will blinds finite intellect with pride, modeled perfectly by
Satan, from seeing the unholy state of sin, which infinite God is
only capable of fully comprehending. Dorian Gray had little eternal
moral self-awareness, as did his inventor Oscar Wilde. This prevents
the wicked from seeing their true state, such as with feces eating
homosexuals, the bloody hands of the religious and political leaders
that murdered Jesus, or baby murdering abortionists. That sight
causes conviction to seek merciful redemption and prayer to the
Father for Holy Spirit filling in order to stop sinful behavior.
The
20” x 16” oil on canvas painting by Dallas F. Bell Jr. is titled
“Wheel Within The Will: Reflections of Genesis 1 and John 1
Barcodes.” It is a scriptural tropology of the passages of Genesis
chapter one, John chapter one, and Ezekiel 1:16, 10:10 etc.,
especially with the rims of eyes in Ezekiel 1:18 which represent the
Trinity’s omniscience. William Yeats referred to the obvious
cyclical seasons in his The
Wheel.
Exposing his “theology within his will,” William Blake used
Ezekiel’s “wheel within wheels” for a demonic parody
(Jerusalem,
The
Four Zoas).
Blake’s The
(First) Book of Urizen
is a parody of the Mosaic biblical book of Genesis with a “wheel
without wheel” Urizenic opposite of Ezekiel’s true theology. Of
course, Blake made accompanying paintings (plates) of his eternally
negative poetic passages. The poem of 3-5-3 syllable lines by Dallas
F. Bell Jr., that accompanies his same-titled painting above, is
below.
Creation
Wheel
within The Will
Reflecting
Equation
Something
from nothing
Mathematics
Omniscience
In
the beginning
Redemption
Infinite
Shape
was on the void
Messiah
Prophesy
Born
of a virgin
Isaiah
Elohim
The
Word became flesh
Gravity
Agape
Whoever
believes
Salvation
Lucifer
Running
to and fro
Entropy
Potiphars
Falsely
accused Him
Religion
Musician
After
God’s own heart
Tehillim
Pre-diluvian
demons saw how beautiful human women were and their lust caused them
to take on human DNA and rape human flesh and enslave human souls.
God sent them to a special place in hell.50
Even the evil Oscar Wilde, with his retarded mIQ and temperament,
recognized an eternally negative sinful state demands the reality of
an alternative positive redeemed state. Negative 1 may exist because
the reflected value of the positive 1 is possible and not vice versa:
-1 < +1.
Due
to the original sin, all finite humans have, by choice, a negative
trajectory toward the gravity of an eternal hell. Obviously, it is
not possible for finite beings to be pre-existent to themselves and
self-create. With Divine justice, love, and merciful redemption,
humans may be made a new creature by the self-existent infinite
Creator.51
Any other way is a futile attempt to rob creator God.52
The new redeemed creature is no longer of this fallen sinful world
and is on the eternal positive trajectory toward the gravity of
heaven.53
It is natural for the fallen sinful world to hate the redeemed and
for the redeemed to hate the fallen sinful world.54
Narrow is the trajectory to heaven55
and the broadly accepted ways that seem worldly right lead to death.56
If the redeemed trust in God and turn their backs on evil, it will
be health to their naval (the source of nourishment in the womb) and
marrow (watering; the making of blood cells for life) to their
bones.57
Sin
against innocent souls may be prevented by innocent souls in
self-defense or in the defense of other innocent souls. Sin against
innocent souls must be justly avenged now by the holy God
supernaturally (e.g. killing the rebellious Karah and Dathan58
etc.) or by His righteous institutions, such as government (e.g.
Israel killed Achan for his rebellious theft and deception59
etc.), or justly avenged eternally in hell. Shakespeare’s Measure
For Measure
looks at societal legislation for sexual misbehavior. It is based on
Matthew 7:2 where the same measure of judgement toward others that
you display will be measured to you. The dominate theme emphasizes
the reality of human nature, “Our natures do pursue, like rats that
ravin down their proper bane, a thirsty evil, and when we drink we
die” (Act 1, Scene II; 128-130), and how nature punishes,
regardless, with sexual diseases (Act 5, Scene I; 126-127).60
Jesus
grew in wisdom and stature, and in favor with God and man,61
but His perfectly moral contrast with the fallen sinful world caused
them to murder Him, if He allowed it. He could have prayed for the
Father to send legions of angels to defend Him, but for His
sacrificial mission of scriptural redemption, He did not.62
The redeemed are to speak to the fallen sinful world whether they
will hear or not.63
False theologies of finite works can never change moral entropy away
for the gravity of hell. The redeemed will still sin in this fallen
sinful world, but are eternally redeemed.64
King David was a man after God’s own heart,65
but lusted, then committed adultery, deceived the stolen woman’s
husband, and finally had the husband murdered. The child of David’s
sinful act died. Their next child was the future king, Solomon.66
Jacob’s, Israel, son, Joseph, did not commit the sin he was
accused of and so was falsely imprisoned for rape. He would become
the head of Egypt and save his entire family, the Israeli nation.67
God works all things together for good to them that love Him and are
called according to His predestined purpose.68
The
philosophy of karma (Sanskrit, action) is obviously a false theology
which ignores the reality of moral entropy in that it is never
possible for finite beings to become behaviorally equal to infinite
righteousness or sinless. Nor can finite beings reach enlightened
freedom from ignorance and misinformation based on full comprehension
of all problems, called nirvana (the act of extinguishing desire and
transcendence of suffering and pain). A prayer for true
enlightenment may be found in the poem below.
Mercury
Mirror
by
Dallas F. Bell, Jr.
Arise
mirror: pity and cause winged men to see, vestīgāte,
The
atomic mass of their seven abominations, so cruel,
As fractured
silver harpooned with haughty eyes of hate,
Gazing pridefully
without vertical affections, spited fuel
Poisoning the lying
tongues of truce breakers, ‘cided gladly,
That justify bloody
hands, vaded, thankless of slippery joy,
Withered corpses of
covetous energy ever ill girded, sadly,
Where vengeful minds
imagine blasphemy, styled to annoy,
Circling feet on rehearsed
footpaths to mischievous wit,
Bearing false witness in
disobedient poems of sour praise,
Like lava gushing, furrow
shaped, from rhyming writ,
For incontinent lovers of cleft
pleasure, expressed always;
Sowing vassal discord among
chiseled brothers’ decay,
Crying “Repent!” before the
sun’s black corona day.69
Finite
beings understand infinite God’s will by a systematic progression
as mapped out in the topological order of the Scriptures—which are
thusly immutable by necessity of the connected past, present, and
future time surfaces.70
Borrowed from two other mathematicians, the Benoit Mandelbrot set z
= z2
+ c
explains
the escalation process (z
= z2)
of variable boundaries of its content (c).
The first output becomes its next input; a wheel within a wheel of
The Will. The process of repeatedly applying the same function x
→ x
(set x
of itself) is called iteration in mathematics.
A
flat space, not distorted by bending it or stretching it, may become
a curved space with non-Hermiticity where curved spaces are duel to
each other--two sides of the same coin. The Chinese researchers at
Purdue University Qi Zhou, Chenwei Lv, and Ren Zhang et al. found
that a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian has curved space where a quantum
particle resides. For example, a quantum in a lattice with
non-reciprocal tunnels is in fact moving on a curved surface. The
ratio of the tunneling amplitudes along one direction to that
opposite direction controls how large the surface is curved, which
makes the phenomena seem more natural,71
to them. A team of Chinese and Indian researchers at Columbia
University’s School of Engineering and Applied Science in 2022 that
their artificial intelligence (AI) program, that they programmed,
factored beyond Einstein’s basic energy, mass, and velocity and
included other variables, such as angular velocity etc., which
indicated, to them, a new frontier in physics understanding.72
They were merely recognizing the reflection of their own ideas in
the AI program. Oxford University physics professor, Julian
Barbour’s 2020 book by Random House, The
Janus Point: A New Theory of Time,
wrote the 2nd
Law of Thermodynamics of time moving toward disorder is wrong and
there is no entropy. He explains the size of the universe is
expanding proportionally and this makes time relative in that time is
running in two directions simultaneously. (It should be noted that
Purdue, Columbia, and Oxford University have gender pronoun policies
that require males, having XY chromosomes, be called female, having
XX chromosomes, if demanded and vice versa reflecting their rejection
of truth and acceptance of truth’s relativity—an oxymoron in that
truth is absolute, and worth seeking, whereas relativity is changing,
and not worth seeking. If truth is rejected there is no mercy, no
knowledge of God...there is swearing, lying, killing, stealing, and
adultery, and blood touching blood.73)
Violations
of God’s commandments (for a discussion of natural law see endnote
127) have negative ordered energy (-1) and their consequences have
negative ordered energy (-1); -1,-1. Compliance with God’s
commandments has positive ordered energy (1) with positive
consequences (1); 1,1. Ordered energy symmetry may only reflect the
binary possibilities either negative (-1,-1) or positive (1,1). If
deceit in a just war has a positive consequence of 1 this means the
deceit was a positive 1 (1,1) and not a violation, -1.74
If taking human life has a consequence of 1 it means the killing was
1 (1,1) and not a violation, -1.75
On the other hand, if the consequence of adultery, -1, ends in the
child’s death, -1, this is an affirmed violation, -1; -1,-1.76
Homosexuality is an abomination, -1, and its practitioners have been
turned over to a reprobate mind,77
-1, worthy of the death penalty;78
-1,-1. Their redemption is not possible because lest the Holy Spirit
draws a person, by the Father, they can not be redeemed79
and the truth of the Holy Spirit could not justly indwell the
reprobate minds of the abominable.80
It is common, however, for there to be remorse for their perverse
unnatural acts, yet they remain as eternally unforgiven as Judas
Iscariot.81
Evil pursues sinners; but good is repaid to the righteous.82
A
pecuniary (money) debt equation is: finitely justly paid = the finite
debt + the finite sum of the debt owed paid by the finite debtor -or-
a finite person on the debtor’s behalf. A moral debt equation is:
eternally justly paid = an eternal broken (life) law + eternal
retributive justice -or- an eternal perfect blood (life) sacrifice.83
Given the wages of sin against the infinite (Holy) God is present
and eternal death84
and must be forgiven by a perfectly Holy sacrifice, only the
Christian theology supplies the demand for merciful redemption. The
Redeemer must be sinless by being both God (Christ) and man born of a
virgin woman (Jesus) by the Holy Spirit. His blood (life) sacrifice
has perfect symmetry of justice, love, and merciful redemption. By
Christ’s blood the redeemed are justly saved from eternal wrath.85
Abraham correctly asked the rhetorical question, shall the creator
God only do what is just?86
Only the Christian theology supplies this theological demand as seen
in the chart below.
Jesus
suffered hunger in the wilderness but did not sinfully turn the
stones into bread at the request of His flesh. Before His sacrifice
on the cross for the sins of mankind, He indicated His flesh was weak
but His uniquely Divine soul was willing to remain perfectly
sinlessly submissive to the will of God the Father.87
The
biblically recorded sinner on the cross with Christ Jesus needed
justice, love, and merciful redemption, which was theologically
supplied by Christ Jesus promising the forgiveness of his sins and
eternal existence with Him in Paradise, beginning that very day.88
With a win (1) lose (0) game theory matrix, this would be always
eternally being infinite God (1) and that repentant sinner (1) or
(1,1), whereas Christ Jesus (1) and the unrepentant sinner (0) on the
cross eternally being 1,0.
An
unbalanced emphasis of either justice, love, or merciful redemption
is inadequate to create a theological demand for a true theological
supply. For example, Islam emphasizes justice, New Age love, Hindu
redemption, Buddhist make finite self the supply of all the
components, and atheists simply ignore the innate transcendent
demand. They create the demand for balanced true Christian
theological supply. If the demand increases, the supply gains in
value, and if the supply increases without increased demand, the
supply loses value. In Idries Shah’s collection of 80 fables,
titled Reflections,
he believed Sufi beliefs, with a Hindu background, preceded Islam and
adapted to it.89
John
Keats wrote in his Ode
on a Grecian Urn
of the innate recognition that “Beauty is truth, truth beauty—that
is all Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.”90
Jesus told the enemies of truth that if they called their
neighbor(s) worthless91
they did not love that neighbor(s) as themselves and so did not love
God with all their hearts, souls, and minds, thereby breaking all of
God’s commandments.92
The redeemed love God for His merciful forgiveness and love others,
and want to help them be redeemed and also know God and His merciful
forgiveness. Infinite God does not show partiality except for those
that fear Him and do right.93
We know that the enemies of Christ Jesus could not find fault with
Him based on Divine law. They had to fabricate evidence94
(violating the commandment to not lie) in order to murder Him95
(violating the law to not murder). His sinless life must ultimately
be accepted by faith from the high probability of the historical
evidence. Augustine and Anselm of Canterbury (Proslogion,
II-IV) promoted the theological method of Fides
Quaerens Intellectum
(Faith Seeking Intelligence), where faith in God begins the path to
understanding God. Anselm indicated “Neque
enim quaero intelligere ut credam, sed credo ut intelligam”
(I do not seek to understand in order that I may believe, but rather,
I believe that I may understand).
This
is not to argue that we can not prove a negative. To say you can not
prove a negative is a statement that itself cannot be proven. What
is inferred is that in some cases there can never be perfect evidence
to provide proof of a statement. To say Christ Jesus was/is sinless
requires infinite knowledge. We may examine a valid argument where
premise 1 is P > Q and premise 2 is not Q concludes therefore not
P; as with if there is a possible fire (P) it needs oxygen (Q) and if
there is no possible oxygen (Q), therefore there is no possible fire
(P). A valid proof for the non-existence of x is if premise 1 is x
and Q must be observable and premise 2 is Q is not observable,
therefore x does not exist. So, if Christ Jesus sinned and sin may
be observed and no sin was observed, therefore there was no sin.
This avoids the false dilemma of either Christ Jesus sinned or He did
not sin and sin can not be proven then Christ Jesus did not sin. A
valid argument is premise 1 is either A or B and premise 2 does not
prove A so it must be B.
The
scientific method includes observation, theorizing, and proving or
disproving the theory.96
Frederic Nietzsche noted in his Beyond
Good and Evil that
it is a fundamental belief of all aristocrats that common people are
untruthful. The ancient Greek nobles referred to themselves as “We
truthful ones.” Thomas Hobbes (Leviathan)
wrote to believe, to trust, to rely on another, is to honor him; sign
of opinion of his virtue and power. To distrust, or not believe, is
to dishonor. When Pilate asked Jesus if He was King of the Jews,
Jesus asked Pilate “Sayest thou this of thyself, or did others tell
thee...?” Sir Thomas Browne (writer of Christian
Morals)
observed in his 1646 Pseudododoxia
Epidemica
that common people were readily deceived and bad discerners of
verity. Shakespeare’s sonnet 138 says “When my love swears that
she is made of truth, I do believe her, though I know she lies,”
(see endnote 12, p. 77). The experimental philosopher Robert Boyle
(Aretology)
postulated in all actions, the authority of the person gives
authority to the example. Recorded in the Dayly
Reflection
(pp. 215-216), Boyle wrote to his sister Katherine that he thought
the world was a great bedlam, peopled with fools and knaves. Hobbes
indicated (Leviathan)
that in beliefs there are two opinions; one of the saying of man; the
other his virtue.
Thomas
Kuhn (Function of Measurement) wrote what scientists seek in
numerical tables is not usually agreement of all, but what they often
call reasonable agreement. Furthermore, if we ask for a criterion of
reasonable agreement, we are literally forced to look in the tables
themselves. Boyle said we continue our study of mathematics which is
(as I think) the bravest science in the world (after Divinity), and I
hope to become proficient therein.97
Christ
Jesus loved the Godhead98
with all His heart, soul and mind (commandments 1-4) and He loved His
neighbor as Himself (commandments 5-10) evidenced by His dying for
their sins.99
He perfectly modeled the seven pillars of wisdom:100
purity, peacefulness, gentleness, reasonableness, helpfulness, and
sincerity, without partiality.101
What
we seen now will soon be gone, but what we can not see will last
forever.102
After conception, man may be sanctified and ordained for the purpose
of their birth.103
The symmetry of eternal moral gravity reflects104
either the kingdom of God or not. Lazarus went to be in Abraham’s
bosom and the rich man went to the lake of fire.105
Christ Jesus said in His Father’s house were many mansions.106
The heart has not seen that extravagance.107
There will be a new heaven without Satan and sinners108
and a new Jerusalem.109
All darkness will be removed because there is only Divine light.110
It would seem that Light would infuse all things, even eliminating
shadows.111
Conversely, the fire of hell has degrees112
and would be the absence of Divine light.113
There will be no painful suffering and tearful death in heaven114
or Shadowlands.115
The unredeemed will see Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and the prophets in
heaven before being cast out into hell.116
On
the Mount of Transfiguration, Christ Jesus was talking with Moses,
representing Divine law, and Elijah, representing Divine prophets,
about His departure at Jerusalem and could be heard by the apostles.117
He promised to return, The Second Coming, as in the times of Noah
where the people knew it not until the flood took them.118
In the last days, mockers will come following after their own lusts
and question where the promise is of Jesus’ coming since all things
continue from the beginning of creation. But they fail to notice
their argument of uniformitarianism ignores that creation symmetry
began first with Elohim in heaven then this universe was formed from
nothing. Consistent with moral entropy of this universe, His word
says this present universe is reserved for a day of judgement and the
destruction of the unrepentant. One day with the Lord is like a
thousand years, and a thousand years are like one day. The Lord is
not slow about His promise, as finite humans count slowness, but He
is patient not wishing any should perish but for all to repent.119
The
Lord says He will care for His redeemed when their hair grows white
and He should be remembered in one’s youth before the days come
when there is no pleasure in them.120
In Shakespeare’s As
You Like It
(known as The
Seven Ages of Man
also called All
the World’s a Stage;
Act 2, Scene VII), Jaques observes (142) “all the world’s a
stage” as he comments on the seventh and last age or stage of man’s
life cycle (168) “...mere oblivion, (169) Sans
(French for without)
teeth, sans
eyes, sans
taste, sans
everything.”
The
unrighteous Hebrew king, Saul threatened to murder people that ate
when they were in battle but the righteous Jonathan ate and was
refreshed.121
The unrighteous flatter themselves in their own eyes until their sin
becomes hateful.122
David wrote the wicked will be cut off, and shall not be, and the
meek will inherit the earth.123
To not serve God justly deserves everlasting punishment and the
righteous mercifully deserves eternal life.124
Du
Fu (also Tu Fu) questioned, in his Dreaming
of Li Bai,
who is to say the way of heaven is always fair?125
The symmetry of Christ Jesus and His creation axiomatically does!
Johann Bach, from a German Lutheran background, expressed his love of
God with traditional symmetry, e.g. the Brandenburg Concerto No. 2 in
F and with The Gavotte En Rondeau from the Partita No. 3 in E major
for Violin. Igor Stravinsky, from a Russian Orthodox background,
sought to express his love of God by expanding musically accepted
symmetry, e.g. The Sacrificial Dance from The Rite of Spring (Le
Sacre du printemps).
Plutarch
asserted in his Convivialium
Disputationum
(Liber 8.2) Plato said “God geometrizes continually.”126
Material nature127
is not self-aware (a non-material eternal soul is necessary to make
the material neurological machinery work) and can not symmetrically
theorize itself and the non-material realm.128
Mathematics is then reasoned to be the unifying linguistic base for
a symmetrical theory of everything. Therefore, there is an unseen
mathematics that transcends human origins with potential for a
Divinely revealed new mathematics. Christ Jesus is the beginning and
end, anaerobically and aerobically, of the Theory of Everything!
“But
of Him are ye in Christ Jesus, who God is made unto us wisdom,
and
righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption.”129
Apostle Paul
1
Latin for What We Know About
What We Do Not Know.
3
Henry Longfellow wrote of an
analog clock in his The
Old Clock on the Stairs.
4
Dallas F. Bell Jr. received this
DARPA email notice from the DSO during June, 2022. Regarding liquid
mirrors, the surface of a fluid in equilibrium is a constant
potential energy surface, which is why most liquids lie flat under
the influence of gravity. However, when rotated at a constant
angular velocity about a vertical rotation axis, the equipotential
surface takes the form of a paraboloid, a shape that focuses light.
This is the principle behind a liquid mirror telescope; light
incident upon a reflective liquid surface, often mercury or
low-melting alloys of gallium, spinning at a constant angular
velocity converges at an affective prime focal point. DARPA also
expressed interest in this process for space-based platforms in an
email notice by DSO to Dallas F. Bell Jr. in July, 2022. There are
gas, liquid, and plasma related mirrors. For example, a laser
focused into a gas cell, where it creates and interacts with a
plasma, generating and accelerating an electron beam. After passing
through that cell, the combined laser beam and electron beam arrive
at the liquid-crystal plasma mirror, at which point the laser is
deflected while the electron beam is transmitted—with negligible
disruption. https://atap.lbl,gov/innovative-plasma-mirror
(Note:
mercury in Hebrew, sig, is dross or refuse, as in Psalms 119:119
etc.)
5
Feynman’s (1963, 1977 6th
printing) Lectures on
Physics (at the
California Institute of Technology), Addison-Wesley Publishing
Company, Reading Massachusetts, section 52.
6
Bromberger, The University of
Chicago Press, Illinois. On file at Stanford University’s
website.
8
Other authors on remembering are
Thomas Moore’s Remember
Thee, Thomas Hood’s
I Remember, I Remember
and Thomas Hardy’s Joys
of Memory and Memory
and I, etc.
9
Ha Jin, (2019) The
Banished Immortal: A Life of Li Bai (Li Po),
Pantheon Books, New York, p. x and Red Pine’s (2003) Poems
of the Masters: China’s Classic Anthology of T’ang and Sung
Dynasty Verse, p. 65.
11
Thomas Hardy: The Complete
Poems, Palgrave,
Hampshire, England, 2001, p. 81.
12
The Sonnets of William
Shakespeare, Avenel
Books, New York, 1959, p. 2.
14
William Cowper wrote, God
the Author of Nature,
with a Buddhist theology that souls are in all things and all is god
meaning he incorrectly believed there is no God.
15
Plato’s Gorgias
(524b), see the text at www.perseus.tufts.edu
Other
writers of death are Charles Dickens’ Death
of Little Paul and
George MacDonald’s O,
My Love is Like a Wind of Death.
16
Part 1, paragraph 2, archived at
the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.
19
II Timothy 4:6; II Thess. 1:9
etc.
20
Luke 1:79; I John 3:14; Romans
5:12, 6:23; John 3:36; Eph. 2:1 etc.
21
Revelation 20:6, 14 etc.
22
In an 8 May, 1928, letter to his
friend Ernst Eckhardt, Einstein attributed his theory of relativity
to Maxwell’s demonstrating that types of energy are aspects of the
same phenomenon.
23
Translations are from entries in
Seigo Nakao’s (1995) Japanese
to English Dictionary,
Random House, New York (see endnote 29).
24
This is a Shinto temple (c.
1617) of the Toshogu shrine (Tosho’s shrine) named for Tokugawa
leyasu, founder of the Tokugawa shogunate.
25
Revelation 12:9, 20:2.
29
The list of Japanese poets was
recommended by Seigo Nakao, Ph.D. in comparative literature from New
York University and retired professor of Japanese studies at Oakland
University, to Dallas F. Bell Jr. in an email exchange during June
and July, 2022. Nakao published his literary book review of
Snakelust
by Nakagami. Its seven stories are (1974) The Mountain Ascetic
(Shugen),
(1975) The Wind and the Light (Somoku),
(1975) Snakelust (Jain),
(1976) Makeup (Kessho),
(1977) Crimson Waterfall (Kurenai
No Taki), (1981) A
Tale of a Demon (Oni
No Hanashi),
and (1981) Gravity’s Capital (Juryoku
No Miyako).
30
Einstein’s (1935), The
World As I See It,
Snowball Publishing, p. 14. John Dunne wrote a satirical poem
titled The Will
about bequeathing his essence to various entities.
31
Romans 7:23; Eph. 2:3.
36
Genesis 39:9; Exodus 10:16; Lev.
6:2-7; Joshua 7:20; Judges 10:10; I John 3:4.
37
Deut. 6:4-9, 11:18-23 etc.
38
Dean Simonton, psychology
professor at the University of California at Davis, estimated Adams’
IQ to be around 168.75. See his (August 2006) “Presidential IQ,
Openness, Intellectual Brilliance, and Leadership: Estimates and
Correlations for 42 U.S. Chief Executives,” Political
Psychology, 27 (4),
pp. 511-526 and his (1986), “Presidential Greatness: The
Historical Consensus and its Psychological Significance,”
Political Psychology,
7 (2), pp. 259-283, as well as, Lindsey Cook’s (27 May, 2015)
“Poindexter in Chief: Presidential IQs and Success in the Oval
Office,” U.S News
and World Report.
39
John Quincy Adams, Letters
of John Quincy Adams, to His Son, on the Bible and Its Teachings,
Auburn, James M. Aden, 1850, p. 61.
40
Rejector of the God of the
Bible, pro child murder, homosexual and pro sexual perversion, liar,
marijuana user etc.
41
Rejector of the God of the Bible, fornicator etc. Jefferson
believed American aboriginal culture would adapt to the civilized
American ideals. He later acknowledged this was incorrect and
American society could not wait until there was change and, in the
meantime, the easter tribes should be moved west of the Mississippi
River. Part of Louisiana was purchased to accommodate the removal.
(Bernard Sheehan, Seeds
of Extinction: Jeffersonian Philanthropy and the American Indian,
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 1973, pp. 42-44, 89-181, 243-275 etc.;
John Finger, The
Easter Band of Cherokees 1819-1900,
The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, Tennessee, 1998, p. 7
etc.)
42
Pro child murder, sexual exploiter of children, pro sexual
perversion, liar, pro drug use, theft by inflation etc.
43
Pro child murder, rapist, sexual exploiter of children, pro sexual
perversion, liar, cocaine user etc.
44
Routinely took God’s name in vain etc.
45
Rejector of Bible accuracy, pro
child murder etc.
46
Murderer, adulterer, lied to
Cherokee, theft of Cherokee land etc. (John Finger, Cherokee
Americans: The Eastern Band of Cherokees in the Twentieth Century,
University of Nebraska Press, Nebraska, 1991, p.117 etc.) The
renown Cherokee warrior, Junaluska (Cherokee for one that falls from
a leaning position) saved Jackson’s life at the Battle of
Horseshoe Bend in March, 1914. He later declared if he had known
Jackson’s intentions, he would not have saved his life but would
have killed him at Horseshoe Bend (John Finger, The
Easter Band of Cherokees 1819-1900,
The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, Tennessee, 1998, pp.
7-8; James Mooney, “Myths of the Cherokee,” Washington, D.C.,
pp. 92-97; Henry Malone, Cherokees
of the Old South: A People in Transition,
Athens, Georgia, 1956, pp. 71-71.) Today in Western North
Carolina’s Haywood County, Lake Junaluska is a Christian retreat
for transforming lives by the renewing of souls, minds, and bodies.
The photo below of Lake Junaluska’s overlook by Dallas F. Bell Jr.
was taken in August, 2022. The monument is a testament to its
evangelical Christian mission.
Shortly
after the above photo of the cross was taken, the bell for the Lake
Junaluska church, seen in the photo by Dallas F. Bell Jr. below,
began to ring signifying the beginning of the worship service.
Lake
Junaluska’s Theologian in Residence is Elaine Heath, an elder in
the United Methodist Church (UMC) and former dean of the divinity
school at Duke University, who is abbess of the Christian farm
community called Spring Forest in North Carolina where her and her
husband reside. In 1956, the UMC broke from its biblical founder
John Wesley in the 1700’s by granting women full clergy authority.
The UMC convention delegates, in 2019, did not approve sexual
perversion largely due to the conservative non-U.S. representatives,
e.g. Philippines etc. The UMC U.S. leadership and seminary
promotion of unbiblical beliefs has reduced membership (11 million
in the 1960’s to 6 million today) and created differentiations of
affiliation, such as the conservative formation of the global UMC
etc. Thanks is extended to Lake Junaluska director Ken Howle for
his email exchange with Dallas F. Bell Jr. on the resort’s UMC
alliance and Heath for her email exchange with Dallas F. Bell Jr.
regarding the person, Junaluska, during August, 2022. Thanks is
also extended to Richard Sneed, former marine, pastor of Christ
Church as well as the two term Principal Chief of the Eastern Band
of Cherokee Indians in North Carolina, for his email exchange with
Dallas F. Bell Jr. in August, 2022.
(Note: In
Acts 2:16-19, Peter refers to Joel 2:28-32 in explaining the
observed beginning of the Holy Spirit filling on Pentecost, of
course including women, by saying in the last days, as he was in,
women will prophesy. Paul later reinforced that truth with the
Divine boundary that women are not to (teach/preach) have authority
over men, as Adam, first man, always had Divine authority over Eve,
first woman, in I Timothy 2:11-15. Therefore, no woman with a
redeemed relationship with Christ Jesus would ever seek to take
authority over men, which would be an act of rebellion against the
true God of the Bible. In Jesus’ Sermon on the Plain, Luke 6:46,
He asked why do you call Me Lord, Lord and do not do what I say?)
50
Genesis 6:1-4; Jude 6 etc.
54
Proverbs 29:27; John 15:18-19.
60
Shakespeare’s (1988) Measure
For Measure, Bantam
Books, Toronto, pp. xix-xx, 27, 111 etc.
62
Matthew 26:53-54; Isaiah 50:6,
53:2-12 etc.
69
See biblical references in
Proverbs 6:16-19, 26:24-25; Ezekiel 16:1-2; II Timothy 3:1-9;
Revelation 6:12-14 etc.
70
In the last of Richard Wagner’s
cycle of four musical dramas Der
Ring des Nibelungen
(German for The Ring
of the Nibelung or
The Ring),
Prologue, Prelude to the Prologue, Scene 1, of Götterdämmerung
(Twilight of the Gods), the rope of destiny had the past, the
present, and the future when Walhalla would be set on fire and the
end of gods would come (“Welch’
Licht leuchtet dort?”).
71
Zhou et al., “Curving the Space by Non-Hermiticity,” Nature
Communications, 21
April, 2022. Researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology
discovered that bodies can move without pushing against something in
curved spaces, seemingly violating the law of conservation momentum.
Their shape-changing robot moved on a sphere and its parts moved
with gravity and friction with hybridized curvature effects (see
“Robotic motion in curved spaces defies standard laws of physics,”
Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences,
July 28, 2022).
72
Boyuan Chen, Sunand Rghupathi et
al., “Automated discovery of fundamental variables hidden in
experimental data,” Nature
Computational Science
(2022).
77
I Kings 14:24; Romans 1:24-31.
78
Lev. 20:13; Jude 6, 7.
79
John 6:44, 16:8-11, 44.
83
Genesis 9:4; Lev. 17:11, 14.
89
Many other books have been
titled “Reflections,” such as the 2011 collection of Christian
poems by Stephen Sterling at WestBow Press (a Christian based
self-publishing company in Bloomington, Indiana), where he indicates
religion makes you blind (Religion
on p. 115), and
theology informs and controls everyone’s thought (Theology
on p. 158).
90
Louis Klopsch, 1905,
Masterpieces of the
World’s Best Literature,
(vol. 5), p. 301.
92
Deut. 6:5; Lev. 19:18; Matthew 5:43-48, 22:36-40 etc.
94
Matthew 26:59-61; Mark 14:56-59
etc.
95
Matthew 26:4; Mark 14:55 etc.
96
For a neurological discussion of
scientific “observation” see Daniel Gilman’s “The
Neurobiology of Observation,” Philosophy
of Science, Vol. 58,
Issue 3, Sept. 1991, pp. 496-502 etc. For a neurological discussion
of scientific “theorizing,” see endnote 128. For a neurological
discussion of scientific “proof” see Joseph Kable and Paul
Glimcher’s “The Neurobiology of Decision: Consensus of
Controversy,” Neuron,
Vol. 63, Issue 6, 24 Sept. 2009, pp. 733-745 etc. To conclude that
there are no proofs would be a proof and thus a self-defeating
argument. In a July, 2022, email exchange between Glimcher
(professor of neural science, economics, and psychology at New York
University) and Dallas F. Bell Jr., Glimcher explained there is not
any research to date on the exact neurological mapping etc. for
studying the making of proofs.
97
Boyle to Cork, 15 May 1642,
quoted in James Jacob’s book on Boyle; as footnoted in Steven
Shapin’s A Social
History of Truth, The
University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, 1994, p. 315.
98
The Godhead is described in Acts
17:29; Romans 1:20; Col. 2:9. Agapaō
(Greek [social or moral] love) has always existed between the
Persons of the Godhead (John 17:24), which pre-existed creation,
which replicates that characteristic of Divine intellect.
103
Jere. 1:5; Luke 1:41, 13-17.
104
See The
Trial of Infinity by
Dallas F. Bell Jr. at
www.systematicpoliticalscience.org/argumentum.html
Feynman’s
Lectures on Physics,
section 52, discusses the reflection symmetry of the laws of
gravity.
110
Revelation 21:23, 22:5 etc.
111
Hans Christian Anderson wrote of
the shadow’s departure in The
Shadow.
112
Matthew 23:14 (not part of
original); Mark 12:40; Luke 12:47-49.
115
The biographical recounting of
C.S. Lewis’ suffering of his wife’s cancer and his grief was
titled Shadowlands.
117
Mark 9:2-8; Luke 9:28-31.
119
Psalm 90:4; II
Peter 3:3-9.
120
Isaiah 46:4 and Eccl. 12:1-7
respectively.
125
Ha Jin, (2019) The
Banished Immortal: A Life of Li Bai (Li Po),
Pantheon Books, New York, pp. x-xi and Red Pine’s (2003) Poems
of the Masters: China’s Classic Anthology of T’ang and Sung
Dynasty Verse, p.
118.
126
Plutarch wrote of Plato the
philosopher and also wrote of Plato the Theban magistrate of the
fourth century in “On Socrates’ Personal Deity” (Plutarch,
Essays,
Penguin Books, New York, 1992, pp. 315, 425).
127
Boyle was known to use the
phrase “natural law” and commented ...and if I sometimes scruple
not to speak of the laws of motion and rest, that God has
established among other things corporeal, and now and then, (for
brevity’s sake, or out of custom) to call them, as men are wont to
do, the laws of nature; [I have] in due place declared, in what
sense I understand and employ these expressions (see Excellency
and Grounds of the Mechanical Hypothesis,
1674, pp. 68-69 etc.). In Thomas Aquinas’ Summa
Theologiae (ST),
he distinguished law as in the intellect of the individual (in this
case God) and also in the idea itself, which is the external law (ST
I-II, 91, 1). Law, then, is not only in the internal reason of the
ruler, but may also be in the external thing ruled. The rule for
constructing a building is in the mind of the architect, but is also
in the building constructed, which dictates its operation and
function (ST I-II,
93, 1). Inversely, the rules evident in the created building by
necessity had to have pre-existed in the mind of its
builder--meaning the existence of a building means there exist its
builder. Everything in nature reflects the eternal law in their own
natures (ST
I-II, 91, 2). The rational creature is subject to Divine providence
in the most excellent way, in so far as it partakes of a share of
providence, by being provident both for itself and for others.
Wherefore it has a share of the Eternal Reason, whereby it has a
natural inclination to its proper act and end: and this
participation of the eternal law in the rational creature is called
natural law (ST
I-II, 91, 2). The natural inclination of humanity to achieve their
proper end through reason and freewill is the natural law. Madness
is then the violating of natural law and not expecting negative
consequences (punishment). It has been acknowledged that insanity
is repeating the same exact thing over and over and expecting a
different realm of results, such as with flipping a coin yields
either heads or tails every time and can never mechanically yield
anything else, and drinking alcohol to excess morally leads to
broken relationships, broken finances, and broken health etc. and
never vice versa or anything morally positive.
Nature
worshippers are seeking to recognize nature as a legal entity and
give personhood status to rivers, trees, and mountains etc.
Aboriginals in Tamaqua Borough, Pennsylvania, were first in the
world to pass such laws in 2006. Now ten U.S. states have enacted
similar legislation, e.g. Santa Monica, California in 2013 etc. The
U.S. was soon followed by Ecuador (2008), Bolivia (2010), New
Zealand (2014), and then Brazil, Columbia, Mexico, and India (for
glaciers etc.) etc. The U.S. Democrat Party, today, is seeking to
make these laws part of their platform. Available at a
Massachusetts Institute of Technology website is Craig Kauffman,
Pamela Martin’s “Constructing Rights of Nature Norms in the US,
Ecuador, and New Zealand,” Global
Environmental Politics,
(Nov. 2018), 18 (4), pp. 43-62.
128
A common definition of
theorizing is the analysis of a set of facts in their relation to
one another. B.F. Skinner wrote theorizing is any explanation of an
observed fact which appeals to events taking place somewhere else,
at some other level of observation, described in different terms,
and measured, if at all, in different dimensions (Skinner, “Are
theories of learning necessary?,” Psychological
Review, 1950; 57 (4):
pp. 193-216.) The neurological controversy over Skinner’s
definition is discussed (p. 193 etc.) at
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701252
|