The Operational Steps and Structural Model
for a Behavioral Analysts' Network
by
Dallas F. Bell, Jr.
Introduction
In order to achieve
individual needs humans have been hardwired to be behavioral
analysts. This ability is for identification of both likeminded
people to join and people to oppose based on their compliance with or
noncompliance with the anchors of Natural Laws of Freewill, NLF.
(Please see Attachment's A and B of the paper by Dallas F. Bell,
Jr. titled The Basic META Corpora and Semantic Taxonomy of Systematic
Political Science.) For example, if a student witnesses someone
stealing, a violation of the NLF #8, from their school locker, the
response of someone with a theology of an infinite God, T1 values,
would be to oppose the thief and the thief's likeminded group.
This same ability to observe, evaluate, and choose who to join or
oppose can be applied to those outside our sphere of direct contact.
Distant political
leaders and complex nation-states can also be systematically
analyzed. The analysis is accomplished by collecting the necessary
data to be used to determine the compliance with or noncompliance
with NLF. The resultant T, theological, R, epistemological, B,
behavioral need level, W, nation-state need level, and E,
eschatological, state can be plotted on a META graph. (Please see
the paper by Dallas F. Bell, Jr. titled META Game Theory: A Holonomic
Approach to Decision Making Formulae.) The plots will indicate the
behavioral momentum toward future compliance with or noncompliance
with NLF. Then a decision can be made by the analyst to join or
oppose the object of the analysis.
Application of the
operational steps and structural model provided in this paper is the
final phase of systematic political science. This indicates a
working knowledge of all other material is required prior to
proceeding further. Analytical success is also dependent on some
computer assistance. Humans have the ability to analyze, as covered
in the first paragraph, but computers' storage, sorting, and
retrieving capacity can facilitate a more thorough and speedy result
if given the correct input. (Please see the paper by Dallas F. Bell,
Jr. titled A Survey of Algorithms, Ontologies and Parameters in
Artificial Intelligence for the Human Behavioral Options of Conflict
and Peace.)
Operational Steps
The operational steps
for analyzing individuals and like minded groups, and institutions
and nation-states are the same. Obviously, there is more data to be
gathered and processed for nation-states than for the other end of
the spectrum, individuals.
--Gather and
transcribe static language data from:
spoken and written by
the subject(s) of the analysis from mining relational data bases
(see Attachment A)
the religious
document(s) of the subject(s) theological leaders and belief
the applicable lexicon
--Gather and
transcribe specific language data from:
interviews
polls
--Gather data on
known behavior
--Determine
problem-solving ability from:
known intelligence
quotient scores
language and behavioral
data
--Process the
language data:
create a corpus and
treebank using Part Of Speech tagging (POS-tagging) and parsers
--Merge language and
behavioral data relating to:
compliance with or
noncompliance with NLF anchors
the behavioral
parameters of T, R, B, W, and E
--Determine
deception strategies from:
behavioral and language
inconsistencies
data that isn't
present which should be that indicates hidden motives (see Attachment
B)
--Narrow the
population of behavioral solutions
--Plot the data on
the META graph by:
the behavior by date
with NLF gradients and problem-solving score
--Determine the most
specific solution for probable behavior
--Fill out the
Analysis Summary Worksheet
--Disseminate the
analysis result
--Complete the
after-action section of the Analysis Summary Worksheet
--Make adjustments
to the process and end the analysis process
Structural Model
Though the model has
over twenty skill positions, the tasks implied could be accomplished
by as few or as many persons that are available or desired.
Personnel
--Chief Executive
Officer
--Operation Divisions:
theology, epistemology, psychology, sociology, and eschatology
--Operation Divisions'
Staff: each division has a computer programmer/linguist,
historian/behaviorist, and an information collection's/interrogation
specialist
--Support Divisions:
security, logistics, and communications/public relations
Materials
--Computers, software,
buildings, communications, transportation, and etc.
Conclusion
The reasons to create
an analysts' network range from forming a for-profit business
enterprise to becoming a not-for-profit consulting service for
advocating which political entities to join or oppose. For example,
some people may like to know the ramifications of a new world leader
imposing a seven year peace treaty on the nation-state of Israel and
requiring all people of the world to be numbered. People with T1
values would oppose that world leader while those with T2 and T3
values may join many of that leader's nefarious efforts.
Therefore, for best results a T1 network should be composed of
likeminded individuals with T1 values (see Attachment C.)
Attachment A
Corpus building
involves the domains of T, R, B, W, and E in the appropriate
language. It is categorized by male and female, age, problem-solving
ability, the institutions of family, church, business, and government
and their subsets.
The corpus can be used
by parsers to form the treebank. This must be monitored manually but
an algorithm or program may be used to determine the syntactic
structure of sentences or strings of language symbols. A lexical
analyzer can compile the initial input for the analysis using tokens.
Treebank tokenization involves the concept of Part Of Speech tagging
(POS-tagging.)
POS-tagging assigns
tags to words in parts of speech to reflect their syntactic category.
To be effective, it needs to segment a word and assign the proper
context. For example, the root word "post" in the word string he
set the fence posts in their holes, posts is a plural noun, and
in the word string he posts the news on the board, posts can
be seen as a verb.
The POS-tagger has a
tokenizer that segments the input of words and sentences. It
recognizes proper names, acronyms, and etc. possibly employing
specialized word lists from religious documents and specific
dictionaries. Those text tokens are used by a morphological
classifier to classify string-tokens as word-tokens with sets of
morpho-syntactic aspects. This includes retrieving the possible
meanings from a lexicon. The lexicon may be organized by either a
word-list where every word is stored with morpho-syntactic aspects or
where the roots of words are provided with their variations. How
ever the lexicon is arranged, each feature is mapped in a POS-tag.
All lexicons are incomplete and a classifier may need to attempt to
classify unknown words.
Word-tokens and
POS-tags have an individual POS-tag reflecting the context made by a
disambiguator. This may be accomplished by either a connectionist or
rule-based method. Whatever the approach the tagging process should
have segmented into words the input text-string and assigned an
individual POS-tag.
Attachment B
Modal logic encompasses
reasoning using expressions like 'necessarily' and 'possibly.'
It includes groups of logic that have similar rules and varying
esoteric symbols as listed below. Those symbols are superseded by
those of systematic political science.
Modal logic--necessary,
[]; possible,
<>
Deontic
logic--obligatory, O; permitted, P; forbidden, F
Temporal logic--will
always be the case, G; will be the case, F; has always been the case,
H; was the case, P
Doxastic logic--x
believes, Bx
The family of modal
logic is useful for knowing what is, but may also be used to indicate
what is not. This is important for both semantic and behavioral
analysis. For example, adultery and murder causes negative
behavioral responses for individuals and their institutions and
subsets, from family to government. This indicates a natural law
exists not to commit adultery or take innocent human life. Then,
algorithms and computer programs should compute not only what is but
what is not. If the object of the analysis doesn't do x it may
point to z. And, if the object of the analysis doesn't do x and y
it may indicate a higher possibility of z. If speech and behavior is
found to support z this may imply a, b, and c etc. are likely. This
procedure does require a high level of completeness and manual
monitoring.
Attachment C
The Natural Laws of
Freewill, NLF, address nonmaterial issues such as the opposing
behaviors of love and hate. Love causes material order and is
consistent with NLF. Conversely, hate causes material disorder and
is inconsistent with NLF. Since natural laws exist in infinity, this
means the behavior of love is infinite and will ultimately defeat the
finite behavior of hate. The existence of natural laws indicate
intelligent design and their characteristics indicate the designer is
infinite. That concept of an infinite being describes the infinite
God. Both the natural laws of freewill, called the Ten Commandments,
and the infinite God have been recorded in the Bible. Being the law
of the infinite God, the Bible must also have the infinite
characteristics of immutability, meaning it doesn't change, and
inerrancy, meaning it has no errors. Therefore, the existing
infinite God must be followed or an inferior finite god will be
followed. Compliance with His commandments indicate a choice to
follow God. Noncompliance with His commandments indicate rejection
of God.
The Bible is divided
into the Old Testament and the New Testament. The Old Testament
records the old covenant relationship between God and man before the
Messiah's appearance. The New Testament records the new covenant
relationship between God and man. Hundreds of Old Testament
messianic prophesies were 100% fulfilled by the life of Jesus. This
means Jesus must be the Messiah. He claimed to be both God and man.
He is the only person to never violate God's commandments. Jesus
must have been whom He claimed--part of the trinity of the being of
God expressed as the Father, His Son Jesus, and the Holy Spirit.
Jesus' stated in the
Bible that He was the (only) way the truth and the life and no man
comes to the Father but by Him. His being perfect would make Him the
only possible hope of an acceptable relationship with God. We know
that all other humans have violated His commandments and the wages of
this trespass, or sin, is disorder, or death. We also know that
since He is infinite and we are finite we cannot be forgiven our
trespasses by our own efforts. The Bible said Jesus willingly died
on the cross without sin for our sins. It is by this atoning grace
that we may be forgiven our trespasses, or sin, and be saved from an
eternity without an acceptable relationship with God. This free gift
will provide purpose, meaning, and direction. He said we might have
life now and have it more abundantly, whatever our circumstances.
Jesus said he has gone to prepare a place for His followers and that
He will return for His followers and spend eternity in heaven
together where there is no sickness or tears. It is not enough that
we merely believe that He exists. The Bible says even devils believe
in the infinite God and tremble. Many have prayed, or spoken in
silence to God, words similar to the following.
Dear God, I know
that Jesus is your Son, and that He died on the cross and was raised
from the dead. I know I have sinned and need forgiveness. I am
willing to turn from my sins and receive Jesus as my Lord and Savior.
Thank You for saving me in Jesus' name. Amen.
If you have desired to
be free from sin and earnestly spoken the above words to God, you
have assurance in His infiniteness that you have been made eternally
part of His forgiven followers. This does not mean you will never
violate His laws or be sinless. It means you are forever forgiven of
your trespasses. We know we are His if we keep His commandments.
This involves reading the Bible to know the commandments and their
subsets. Understanding His words necessitates both prayer for His
guidance and meeting with other followers at church. In time, you
will produce fruit, which are conversions of others, while displaying
His Spirit's love, charity, patience, and long-suffering. People
with such beliefs and behavior constitute the T1 category of values
in systematic political science.
--ALL
RIGHTS RESERVED 2005 DALLAS F. BELL,
JR--
|