Cognition Duality in a Post-Truth Era of Transfinite Induction:
In Silico¹ Cognitive Dissonance Between Words and Math/Logic as Time Dilation

by
Dallas F. Bell, Jr.

The laws of nature are but the mathematical thoughts of God.²

Exegesis of “… take no thought for tomorrow because tomorrow shall take thought for the things of itself³…” does not imply the measurement of movement in space and time can have thought. It does indicate an interdependence between time and thought⁴ (see endnote 51).

Modulation in which the time of occurrence of a definite portion of a waveform is varied in accordance with a modulating signal is time modulation. Somewhat similarly, the slowing down of clocks due to high speeds is called time dilation. Time dilation is a difference in the elapsed time measured by two clocks, either due to them having a velocity relative to each other, or by there being a gravitational potential difference between their locations. Its precise mathematical relationship is seen in the equation for calculating time dilation: t = t₀/(1-v²/c²)^1/2 ,where t = time observed in the other reference frame, t₀ = time in observers own frame of reference (rest time), v = the speed of the moving object, and c = the speed of light in a vacuum.⁵

Cogitation or thought (Hebrew machashebeth) is a machine, imagination, invention, or contrivance. It categories are imagining (a new concept in a dream or vision⁶ etc.) and recollecting (an old memory etc.). Its purpose is either for passive pleasure (a sunset etc.) or for aggressive action (resolve internal conflict etc.). Rational thoughts are expressed in the language of words⁷ or math/logic symbols. Language is the ability to encode ideas into signals for communication to someone else. Language is a limited code and not the ideas themselves. Ideas may be images or abstract concepts, etc.

Quantum supercomputers merged with the simultaneous location with neurological thought is not a possibility for many reasons.⁸ Hypothetically, the entity of a thought by quantum (dual) locations, such as a programmer's neurological thought (e.g. 2 + 2 = 4 whose activity may be seen on an fMRI) which is (hypothetically) simultaneously recorded by a futuristic supercomputer can be analyzed. If thought x is located at location 1 (the programmer's neurons) and also in location 2 (the supercomputer), yet sets x = 1 and x = 2 are separate, would/should the supercomputer make a distinction between a true thought (T), such as 2 + 2 = 4 etc., and a false thought (F) for filing, such as 2 + 2 = other than 4 etc.? Even in a post-truth era⁹ the answer is yes. The purposeful nature of programming by a rational intellect is deterministic and not chaotic.¹⁰ Then, an equation must justly have equality. Additionally, it is obvious that thought is for/to both inside of self and outside of self, which is to God. Just as the input to a computer by the programmer and the output of that computer is for the programmer, or else it would have no purpose.

The chief aim of all investigations of the external world should be to discover the rational order and harmony, which has been imposed on it by God and which He revealed to us in the language of mathematics. Science is thinking God’s thoughts after Him.¹¹ Human thinking, sequential thoughts, is the ability to have an idea and infer new ones from old ones.¹² This is the scientific method of observing redundancy of old things and not first things, which is inference ex animi sententia. For a biblical example, pride can be observed, theorized to lead to destruction, and affirmed by the observation of prideful falls.¹³ God used the scientific method in challenging people to observe the truth of giving tithe to Him and proving the theorizing of His blessings, which are promised to follow.¹⁴

The dominant theory of scientific method in the behavioral sciences is the hypothetical deductive method. According to the standard portrayal of this method, hypotheses or theories are arrived at by conjecture and tested indirectly by deriving one or more observational predictions. If a prediction is supported by data then the results are considered to confirm the theory or hypotheses. Likewise, if the predictions are not borne out by data, then the theory or hypothesis is thought not to be confirmed. Another common scientific method is the inductive method, in which data are collected in a theory-free manner that provides the basis for bottom-up scientific reasoning of hypotheses, laws, or theories. The abductive method adopts a view of problems known as the constraint-composition theory. Briefly stated, the constraint-composition theory asserts that a problem comprises all the constraints on its solution, along with the demand that the solution be found.¹⁵

When things can not be replicated, i.e. creation of the universe etc., inferences by fulfilled predictions provide the best explanation. That process assumes adequate initial inputted data to make a viable theory. Conflict can arise from inputted word to word truth differences, math/logic to math/logic truth differences,¹⁶ and especially word to math/logic truth differences.

René Descartes noted in his Meditations on First Philosophy: Meditation II, 13 (translated by John Veitch in 1901 and others) “… I feel greatly astonished when I observe [the weakness of my mind] and its proneness to [fall insensibly into] error. For although, without at all giving expression to what I think, I consider all this in my own mind, words often impede my progress and I am almost deceived by the terms of ordinary language.”¹⁷

Cognitive dissonance is commonly characterized as a state of psychological tension that arises as a result of conflict between cognitions and observed behavior. In order to resolve the state of psychological discomfort, the subject is motivated to either change their behavior or (more typically) cognitions in order to re-establish consistency. The notion of cognitive dissonance has been used to account for the cognitive changes observed in subjects who engage in counter-attitudinal behavior. In 1967 for example, Linder et al¹⁸ asked college students to write an essay supporting a ban on communist speakers, a position with which the students strongly disagreed. The subjects were paid either small ($0.50) or large ($2.50) amounts of money to write this essay. Dissonance theory predicts that when justification for engaging in counter-attitudinal behavior is weak (as is the case when subjects are paid a small amount of money), then cognitive dissonance will be high, and subjects will, as a result, be inclined to engage in attitudinal change as a means of providing additional justification for their actions. Consistent with this prediction, Linder et al observed that subjects who had been given relatively small amounts of money for writing the essay exhibited an attitudinal shift in favor of banning communist speakers. As part of their attempt to develop a computational model of cognitive dissonance, Schultz and Lepper used CSNs (Constraint Satisfaction Models) to model the conditions associated with a number of cognitive dissonance experiments,¹⁹ including those seen in the Linder et al study. They showed that CSNs could be used to model the profile of cognitive changes seen across a number of cognitive dissonance research paradigms, including prohibition (where a subject is prevented from engaging in a desired activity), initiation (where a cost is imposed on group membership), and forced compliance (where a subject is coerced or induced to engage in counter-attitudinal behaviors).²⁰

Constraint-satisfaction neural networks attempt to satisfy as many constraints as possible as well as possible. The network model explained and predicted phenomena, such as the free-choice paradigm (see endnote 51), in which evaluation of the chosen object increases, but more so in a difficult choice between less desirable items. Evaluation of a rejected object decreases, but more so with a difficult choice between highly desirable items.

Using CSNs, a constraint satisfaction problem can be modeled as a set of inter-connected nodes, with the weight assigned to the linkages between nodes indicating the relative importance of constraints that must be satisfied as part of the problem-solving process. The problem-solving process itself typically assumes the form of spreading activation between the nodes, and the solution to the problem is given as the activation vector across all nodes after a specified number of processing cycles has elapsed.

Figure 1 below organizes cognitive units in a single agent. Nodes in this diagram represent cognitive units, each of which represents a belief held by the agent, in this case murder. Solid lines represent beliefs between the units, while wavy lines represent non-beliefs (all links are bidirectional).

Below Figure 2 shows the connectivity pattern for both positive (A) and negative (B) linkages between cognitive units. Beliefs are symbolized by solid lines, non-beliefs are symbolized by wavy lines indicating the belief status.²¹

Each connection of Figure 2 has a weighting that determines the amount of influence it exerts. With the connectivity pattern for both positive (A) and negative (B) linkages between cognitive units, a link will determine the level of influence a source cognitive unit has on a target unit, and this can be used to indicate the strength of the association between different cognitions. In the case, of the CSN shown in Fig. 1, for example, a stronger weighting could be assigned to the link connecting the 1, 4 or the 2, 3 units as compared to the link connecting the 1, 3 or the 2, 4 units as seen in the distilled Hartle-Hawking quantum gravity model below. These leaders of a post-truth era, which formally began around 1992,²² used imaginary numbers²³ to fraudulently disprove 1, 4 in order to deceitfully prove 2, 3 (see endnote 16). Post-truth is an obvious dangerous attempt to be post-God and vice versa,²⁴ but God’s eternal truth will endure to all generations.²⁵

1. (T) Finite space-time has a beginning and end boundary edge or singularity.

2. (F) Finite space-time does not have a beginning and end boundary edge or singularity.

3. (F) beginning and end ≠ singularity

4. (T) beginning and end = singularity

The cognitive dissonance of loss, win (2, 4) or win loss (1, 3) can be seen in the game theory style matrix below.

Hawking’s fellow liar and fellow atheist Josef Stalin was a thief and communist mass murderer. Communism is the logical societal government extension from individual atheist beliefs: 2. (F) There is no God to establish laws over man. 3. (F) God ≠ transcendent authority. Quotes attributed to Stalin often include the following. “Gratitude is a sickness suffered by dogs. People who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything. Ideas are far more powerful than guns. We don't let our people have guns. Why should we let them have ideas? Education is a weapon, whose effect depends on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed. A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic.” History has proven that liars will steal from you and thieves will murder you.²⁶ But whoever lies and causes the righteous to go astray will fall into their own pit.²⁷ Vladimir Lenin’s, Stalin’s murderous mentor, life ended as Shigalov in Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s The Possessed, “I am perplexed by my own data; my conclusion is in direct contradiction of the original idea with which I start. Starting with unlimited freedom, I end with unlimited despotism.”²⁸

Famous biblical examples of cognitive dissonance are also presented.

King David (adultery²⁹)

1. (T) To have sexual intercourse with another man’s wife is adultery.

2. (F) To have sexual intercourse with another man’s wife is not adultery.

3. (F) covetous lusting ≠ adultery

4. (T) covetous lusting = adultery

A belief change and repentance for David, from the dissonance of 2 and 4, occurred, via the logical rebuke of Nathan, correctly aligning 1 and 4.³⁰ The unrighteous state (2, 3 or cognitive dissonance of 2, 4 or 1, 3) does not understand injustice but the righteous state (1, 4) does.³¹

Saul/Apostle Paul (lying³²)

1. (T) To bear false witness against the innocent is lying.

2. (F) To bear false witness against the innocent is not lying.

3. (F) deceitful witness ≠ lying

4. (T) deceitful witness = lying

A belief change and repentance for Saul (renamed Paul the apostle), from the dissonance of 2 and 4, occurred, via the logical rebuke of Jesus, correctly aligning 1 and 4.³³

When words are many, sin is unavoidable.³⁴ Math/logic professions are characterized by people with great predictive analytics³⁵ toward themselves, others and their environment, such as farmers and neurosurgeons etc. (95% are conservative toward natural law). Language dominate professions are characterized by people with poor logic and predictive analytics toward themselves, others and their environment, such as journalists and librarians etc. (95% are liberal toward natural law). Women (having XX chromosomes) speak almost 10 times more words each day than males (having XY chromosomes), and are 13 times less likely than males to be inclined to complex `math/logic.³⁶

Eve (the original sin of rebellious self-righteous faith against God)

1. (T) If you sinfully eat of the tree of good and evil you will die.

2. (F) If you sinfully eat of the tree of good and evil you will not die.

3. (F) sin ≠ death

4. (T) sin = death

Eve had dissonance with her 2, 4 beliefs,³⁷ but Adam did not with his harmonious 1, 4 beliefs.³⁸ By this it is clear women are easily led into sin and especially idolatry.³⁹ They are easily deceived and are not generally wise (not having both language and math/logic abilities).⁴⁰ In accordance with the scientific method, the Bible teaches women are to ask their husbands when needing help with their predictable cognitive dissonance.⁴¹ Understanding this reality, the U.S. government wisely did not encourage women to vote until over a hundred years after its founding. After which they predictably have consistently politically supported liberal anti-natural law efforts.

Cognitive dissonance is a logic bomb, as used on computer programs by spycraft practitioners, activated in the human algorithm when there is confusion between two cognitions (thoughts), which cannot exist together. As the person somewhat believes both the thoughts to be true, it invokes mental tension. This debilitating tension is typically reduced by changing one of the dissonant elements, or adding new ones, until mental consonance is achieved, as seen for B in Figure 2. Fyodor Dostoevsky knew of the destructive addictive problems with gambling as he expressed to his brother, Mikhail, on 8 September, 1863.⁴² Yet, he persisted in the harmful behavior until around 1871, nearly losing everything. He even had to pawn his watch on one occasion. The internal conflict (belief of 2, 4) was chronicled in his novella The Gambler.

Dostoevsky (gambling is an attempt to get something for nothing)

1. (T) Given the game, the casino wins around 98% of the time and you lose.

2. (F) Given the game, the casino does not win around 98% of the time and you do not lose.

3. (F) gambling ≠ your loss

4. (T) gambling = your loss

People with high innate problem-solving ability (IQ) see patterns, especially numbers, that they uniquely use for frequent reasoning. When they solve a problem brain chemicals are released (i.e. serotonin, dopamine etc.) producing a feeling of euphoria they want to replicate, especially during times of stress (i.e. Dostoevsky’s wife, Maria, and brother, Mikhail, died in 1864 leaving him with the financial responsibility of caring for his brother’s widow). When Dostoevsky first won at the roulette wheel and card games, in his exhilarated state as with many others with high IQs, he saw a pattern of winning numbers wrongly associated with a winning strategic system. It took years until he accepted the reality of both 1, 4.

The Infinite Creator can not have cognitive dissonance, which is caused by incomplete and/or accepting false input (see endnote 2). This reality allows for comparison of the Infinite God of the Bible, sola Scriptura and absent cognitive dissonance, with other god(s). For example, yin and yang beliefs in Taoism and Confucianism, Buddhist’s noble silence to illogical beliefs (i.e. the highest level of nirvana is pointless extinction), Hindu’s have thousands of competing gods, Muslim’s say they are a religion of peace yet Jihad, meaning war, is their stated purpose, atheists see themselves as the relative standard of good/god but demand absolute transcendent justice from others, and Judaism uses the dissonance laden Talmud for exegesis as does sola Scriptura rejecters use their additions or subtractions to Divine biblical text as follows: 2. (F) God was not competent in producing holy (meaning complete) Scriptures. 3. (F) God’s Scriptures ≠ transcendent authority. The word of omniscient and omnipotent God would be infinitely pure and changing that perfect data set would show those finite beings to be liars requiring God’s punishment.⁴³ Parables are unequal in the mouth of fools.⁴⁴

Group cognitive dissonance involves individuals drawing different conclusions from the same information. Members of a jury, for example, may disagree on the verdict even though each member possesses the same information on the case under discussion. This happens because individuals can hold different reasonable and unreasonable positions on the information they share. The question is how the group can reach a common stance starting from the positions of each member. A recent paper, Manipulation in Group Argument Evaluation, looks at how individual beliefs can be mapped into a collective one.⁴⁵ It investigates the behavior of two operators from a social choice-theoretic point of view. In particular, it studies under which conditions these operators are Pareto optimal⁴⁶ and whether they are manipulable.

Twelve Hebrew Spies (trust God or rebel against God)

1. (T) Reconnoiter the land of Canaan to be conquered which God gave Israel forever.

2. (F) Reconnoiter the land of Canaan to be conquered which God did not give forever Israel.

3. (F) Canaan ≠ Israel forever

4. (T) Canaan = Israel forever

One spy for each of the twelve tribes of Israel was selected to search Canaan which God promised to Israel. Ten of the twelve spies (Hebrew meraglim) conveyed cognitive dissonance 2, 4 beliefs influencing much of Israel and two spies had harmonious 1, 4 beliefs. The ten spies were justly killed by God (with a plague) along with their rebellious followers later and the two spies (Joshua and Caleb) were allowed to enter the promised land of Canaan.⁴⁷ The average length of time whole societies, such as ancient Nineveh⁴⁸ or the modern U.S.,⁴⁹ take to require changes of unrighteous thoughts for Divine behavioral reformation or requires the alternative Divine regime change is around one-hundred years.

This universe’s entropy system demands time had a beginning and has a future end, which demands its existence is within an immutable eternal set. Those set times are absolutes, which must have had a first Causer. Then, time is absolute with finite observers, t₀, understanding its temporal segments, measured by two clocks, as relative to each other. With dilation, the act of expanding, the greater the velocity the more time is affected. Rest time, t₀, is the shortest time and is called proper time. The reality of absolutes means there is eternal truth (T) and untruth (F), so there is objective immutable equality, =, and inequality, ≠. In other words, belief A and belief not, ¬, A means one is eternally T and one is eternally F. The statements of “your truth is not my truth” and “all truth is subjective” are absolutes objectively disproving those beliefs⁵⁰ (see endnote 16). Dissonance occurs when both T and F are believed, as 2, 4 below.

1. (T) All truths are relative, which is an absolute.

2. (F) All truths are relative, which is not an absolute.

3. (F) truth ≠ absolute

4. (T) truth = absolute

No dissonance occurs with 1, 4 beliefs. Like two clocks in time dilations, the cogitation duality of words and math/logic help reconcile the dissonance for finite intellects. Each are suitable for computational programing, which would necessarily need to use the boundaries of T. A lemma example, it is T that 2 + 2 = 4 leads to 4 – 2 = 2 and other objectively productive truths, whereas the F of 2 + 2 ≠ 4 leads to 4 – 2 ≠ 2 and other objectively unproductive untruths. Deductively consider the transfinite induction⁵¹ contained in the words and math/logic of the following sets: (⊦ Scriptures ∃ ∴ seven day creation ∴ original sin ∴ death ∃ ∴ genealogies ∴ 4^th commandment ∴ redeemer ∃ ∴ redemption to all the world ∴ redeemed to eternal heaven and unredeemed to eternal hell)⁵² ∵ (⊦ =∃ ∴ justice ∃ ∴ my life ¬ > your life ∴ freewill ∃ ∴ just Creator ∃ ∴ Scriptures ∃ ∴ eternal judgment ∃) which eliminates the possibility of (⊦ ¬ Scriptures ∃ ∴ ¬ seven day creation ∴ ¬ original sin ∴ ¬ death ∃ ∴ ¬ genealogies ∴ ¬ 4^th commandment ∴ ¬ redeemer ∃ ∴ ¬ redemption to all the world ∴ ¬ redeemed to eternal heaven and unredeemed to eternal hell) ∵ (⊦ ¬ =∃ ∴ ¬ justice ∃ ∴ my life > your life ∴ ¬ freewill ∃ ∴ ¬ just Creator ∃ ∴ ¬ Scriptures ∃ ∴ ¬ eternal judgment ∃).⁵³

Cognitive dissonance is the natural state of the finite human condition. Paul said the good he would do he does not do and the evil he would not do he does.⁵⁴ Some people bless God yet curse man who were created after the similitude of creator God.⁵⁵ Obviously, one can not serve two masters, e.g. both God and money.⁵⁶ One can not have a carnal mind and submit to God.⁵⁷ One can not be idolatrous and still pray to the true God⁵⁸ and expect Him to reward that effort.⁵⁹ Recognizing cognitive dissonance (c. 862 B.C.), biblical doctrine teaches one must follow God or another god and not be double minded.⁶⁰ Being doubled minded⁶¹ is due to doubt of God’s character.⁶² Prayer to God must be made to help unbelief.⁶³ There is victory over that stressful state in believing God’s holy character of promising good to His followers.⁶⁴ Believers are not to address conspiracies (Hebrew qesher) as non-believers address conspiracies nor are they to fear as they fear.⁶⁵

Individual believer (choose to fearfully worry or obey God, I AM,⁶⁶ and not fearfully worry)⁶⁷

1. (T) Do not fear because I AM is with you.

2. (F) Do not fear because I AM is not with you.

3. (F) fear ≠ disobedience

4. (T) fear = disobedience

As God’s eternally written poiema (Greek for workmanship and the modern English root for poem, Eph. 2:10), a believer is destined to choose harmony with 1, 4 beliefs over 2, 4 beliefs (Ps. 139:16), first by sola fide from sola Scriptura and then proven experientially by the redundancy of the objective scientific method (see endnote 14).

In a material system, one gain is another’s loss (win, loss; Pareto). Thought has the potential to produce change in the entropy of human interaction (see endnote 46). Thought, then, is beyond materialistic boundaries and a material computer can never actually have them in silico. Cogitation duality exists in how finite humans think and process input, as with observing two clocks in time dilation. Dissonance is to be expected and reasoned toward a resolution found in the words and math/logic of transfinite induction preventing any actual post-truth era. Deriving from scientific method, the primary purpose of scientific method is to better understand the first Causer of all effects.⁶⁸ The greatest deduced truth is the immutable character of God and His scriptural promises, which is the profitable future focus for physicists. Thought x is part of a temporal set of a measurement in time but it is also part of an eternal set of all individual recorded thoughts that a righteous God will judge for sinfulness.⁶⁹ Jesus the prophesied Messianic Redeemer Christ is the historical perfect harmonic embodiment of words and math/logic of truthful thoughts—the Logos.⁷⁰ The eternally harmonic decision summary required of all humans for choosing either (T) 1, 4 or (F) 2, 3 follows.⁷¹

1. (T) Adam’s rebellious faith in himself against God committed the original sin of self-righteousness, which is death, therefore Jesus the Redeemer gave loving grace by His righteousness, which justified by faith alone in Him is eternal life.

2. (F) Adam’s rebellious faith in himself against God did not commit the original sin of self-righteousness, which is not death, therefore Jesus the Redeemer did not give loving grace by His righteousness, which is not justified by faith alone in Him for eternal life.

3. (F) Adam ≠ self faith ≠ original sin ≠ self-righteousness ≠ death ∴ Redeemer ≠ loving grace ≠ His righteousness ≠ Redeemer justified faith ≠ eternal life.

4. (T) Adam = self faith = original sin = self-righteousness = death ∴ Redeemer = loving grace = His righteousness = Redeemer justified faith = eternal life.

So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many and to them that look for Him shall He appear the second time without sin to salvation!⁷² Given the coming famine of God’s words,⁷³ the transfinite conclusion of the acrostic sestina style lemma is by Dallas F. Bell Jr.

Zorn’s Lemma in a Marshill Coda⁷⁴

Absolute complete without potentiality of becoming exists infinity.

By finitum non capax infiniti, self-existent infinity static state is moved in eternity.

Christ the ubiquitous first Causer of all effects of time and space in entropy of this closed system is preexistent aseity of peace.

Dutiful general mediate natural theological revelation indicates mathematical creation is separate from the understood masculine Jehovah Creator Causer of unconscious inorganic, without an innate sense of self, and organic objects of unique DNA species' codes with male and female information for wisely ordered efficient purpose.

Earnest creating is purposed from single infinite Pantokrator intellect of omniscience, omnipotence, and omnipresence which can occupy by mechanism in creation.

Faithful homoousian Intellect or sovereign Elohim God of law, created with diversity from a plural of intensity, has the attribute of justice.

Generational distributive, punitive etc. justice requires the rational options of right and wrong or good and evil from the dichotomy "A" can not be both "A" and "not A" simultaneous law.

Hallowed reality of right and wrong requires observer causal conscious intellect with an innate sense of self and divinely permitted freewill within predestination to make an effect of choice, allowing for consequences such as pain and suffering. The observer's relationship with reist and entia rationis objects requires standards to measure and judgments to be decided with purpose.

Individuals need mercy and grace for the original noetic evil, called sin, which separates the guilty from the signified God of judgment and life, and is death, the signifier of justice.

Justice is eternal and needs eternal enforcement of law.

Known eternal rewards for good and evil require an eternal heaven for the predestined compliant elect with new eternal bodies non posse peccare and an eternal hell for the noncompliant essences of each intellect after death which is once experienced then the judgment from which no one can return to present time/space decayed bodies and leave eternal bodies unoccupied in eternity.

Leased unmerited mercy and grace needs love to forgive sin in infinity.

Mortared agape or benevolent love needs redemption for the repentant from (omission and commission) sin by grace alone, which is the gift of infinite God and can not be earned by finite creation.

Naked redemption is based on immutable eternal Divine righteousness and requires an atonement plan, iustitia extra nos, to fill the gap between infinite standards and the finite created intellect whose fruit leads to peace.

Orthodox infinite Creator's attributes and His acceptable plan must be revealed in a Scriptural canon by moral, ceremonial, and civil law.

Perfectly efficient Scripture must be immutable yet with use of anthropocentric linguistic tools which includes the afterlife and extra-natural beings to be understood in a sensus literalis, historicus, and clear parables or allegoricus of purpose.

Quarried behavioral commands must be given regarding relationship standards between man and God, such as loving Him with all one's heart, soul and mind by having no other gods, making no images of God, not taking God's name in vain, and keeping His day holy as He hallowed the seventh day of His universe creation.

Revelation emanates generally and intermediately from behavioral commands to treat others as one wants to be treated, or the Golden Rule, must be given regarding relationship standards between man and man, such as loving one's neighbor as one's self, by honoring one's father and mother, not murdering, not committing adultery, not stealing, not lying, and not coveting despite the entropy of the effort to even love one's enemies with justice.

Successful elimination of the false in one and false in all or perjurer's rule, the supreme moral authority is proven by Scriptural historical, prophetic temporal, and eternal inerrant eschatology witnessed first-hand by the observable fact of nature written in the hearts of children from birth, sensus divinitatis, with the innate ability to recognize nouns and verbs, in that they do not want to be lied to, stolen from, or murdered etc. and even thinking those things causes neural change and is a violation for eternity.

Those laws and specific revealed theological plans for redemption by a living faith provide hope and purpose and are good news or gospel and must be basar/kerusso by the elect, dignitatis humanae, since these beliefs are an abomination to the unrepentant and their profane philosophies of peace.

Unified whole/holy God of love must be prayed to, worshiped, and praised saying holy, holy, holy, hallelujah or praise the name of God, Yahweh of infinity.

Veiled behavioral violations of Divine law require societal punishment and prevent elpizō in trust and efficiency of achieving individual needs of survival, economic security, love and affection, self-esteem, and self-actualization in peace.

Wise societal efficient creation requires the institutions of family for perpetuation and individual education, church for group education, medical orphanages and other efficient centralizing of efforts, business, and government to protect the lawful from the lawless with police and military within Scriptural designation of theological geography for eternity.

X fallible human government justice needs to separate powers with a judicial branch, a legislative branch, and an executive branch, on purpose, which use Divine law as societal law.

Yoked societies will have cycles from reformation to revolution as they accept or reject Divine law’s infinity.

Zōē⁷⁵ or Zephaniah.⁷⁶

----------ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2020 © DALLAS F. BELL, JR.----------