Reality and the Self Algorithm (S = S1 <: S2, S2 <: S3, S3 <: S4, S4 <: S5, S5 <: S6, S6 <: S7):
Dieu est un Mathématicien et est le Programmeur d'Ordinateurs Biologiques¹

y = | x |

Joseph Conrad (born Józef Teodor Konrad Korzeniowski) wrote Lord Jim (1899-1900). It addresses the subject of the psychology of self with the character Marlow as a nuanced moral relativist by somewhat shunning codified judgment, u cog (~ ∞k) → u cog (bS ⌐ k). Marlow’s compassion toward Jim is shown by Conrad as a sign of psychological freedom because it is internal, whereas Jim’s satisfaction is derived from the approval of others and so is not free.

If a person has a self-ideal of a racist, they can be predicted to assert racism and seek to self-replicate racists, their self-identity must also be racist. A British citizen had proclaimed to have a self-ideal of a convicted psychopathic serial killer whose idol was British serial killer Peter Sutcliffe. It should have been no surprise that he was recently arrested and confessed to being a serial killer himself, u cog (~ ∞k) → u cog (bS ⌐ k). During his public court appearance, the former Ph.D. candidate in homicide studies, self-identified as a serial killer and clearly asserted he lived by his own rules. It is reasonable to believe that the publicity would aid his possible self-replication.⁶² U.S. serial killer and self-identified atheist, Israel Keyes’ childhood friends were racists and convicted murderers, Chevie and Cheyne Kehoe. Keyes said that he admired U.S. serial killer, Theodore Bundy.⁶³ Bundy said all moral judgments are subjective, u cog (~ ∞k) → u cog (bS ⌐ k), and pleasures are not moral or immoral.⁶⁴

Irrational self-identity, such as homosexual/transgender, is not a material biological or nonmaterial spiritual reality. Princeton University professor of Jurisprudence, Robert George is quoted as saying that the belief “that a woman can be trapped inside a man’s body is ludicrous and superstitious, with no basis in medical fact.” Paul R. McHugh, the former psychiatrist-in-chief for Johns Hopkins Hospital and its current Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry, said that transgenderism is a “mental disorder” that merits treatment, that sex change is “biologically impossible,” and that people who promote sexual reassignment surgery are collaborating with and promoting a mental disorder.

The American College of Pediatricians wrote a position statement in 2016-2017 authored by McHugh, Michelle A. Cretella, M.D. President of the American College of Pediatricians, and Quentin Van Meter, M.D. Vice President of the American College of Pediatricians Pediatric Endocrinologist. It states, among other things, that human sexuality is an objective biological binary trait: XY and XX are genetic markers of male and female, respectively. A person’s belief that he or she is something they are not is, at best, a sign of confused thinking. When an otherwise healthy biological boy believes he is a girl, or an otherwise healthy biological girl believes she is a boy, an objective psychological problem exists that lies in the mind not the body, and it should be treated as such. These children suffer from gender dysphoria. Gender dysphoria (GD), formerly listed as Gender Identity Disorder (GID), is a recognized mental disorder in the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association (DSM-V). The psychodynamic and social learning theories of GD/GID have never been disproved. Conditioning children into believing a lifetime of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex is normal and healthful is child abuse. Endorsing gender discordance as normal via public education and legal policies will confuse children and parents, leading more children to present to gender clinics where they will be given puberty-blocking drugs. This, in turn, virtually ensures they will “choose” a lifetime of carcinogenic and otherwise toxic cross-sex hormones, and likely consider unnecessary surgical mutilation of their healthy body parts as young adults.⁶⁵ The logical result of homosexuality must be a reprobate mind.⁶⁶

Given atheism as an identity, the following question emerges. What objective epistemological standard rationally necessary for neurological inputting of what is (transcendent) considered good and evil is recommended (such as Stephen Wolfram, Mario Livio etc.) to determine the self-ideal used by necessity to harmonically conform symmetrical behavioral goals from the chosen self-identity (especially necessary for the behavioral cohesion of a complex institution/society)?

In an email exchange with Dallas F. Bell Jr. in September, 2019, a well-known self-identified atheist Ivy League Ph.D. admitted to being confused and wrote the question in the preceding paragraph above seems “to be confusing identity as a political class membership, and identity as personhood, a cognitive entity. Neither can be chosen, only recognized or embraced (choices can affect it, but that’s not the same thing). Identity as personhood is literally a physical pattern in the brain and its causal history; it’s what your brain evolved to build and update a model of, that you call your “self.” Identity in political jargon does not refer to that, but to categories other people put you in and treat you differently because of--which come with causal histories attached, but they aren’t uniquely yours, and exist externally from your brain (and only may or may not have causally affected your brain). You can’t choose your political identity either, except by exiting a class (e.g. ceasing to be an atheist). Otherwise, once you are a thing, you are the thing. There is no escaping that. At most you can try to ignore it or pretend it doesn’t have social consequences; but reality does not obey your will like that. Ignoring facts, does not make the facts go away.”

That honest opinion represents numerous problems of coherence due to ignorance and bias, such as seeming to not accept the concept of freewill to choose differing courses of behavior which monozygotic twins (raised together) frequently demonstrate with independent choices while noting the reality of having a “will”, a lack of the logical defining of obvious terms, not knowing fMRI studies and dysfunctional brain examples disprove only material neurology of thoughts,⁶⁷ referring to biological evolving without evidence from replication (the last step of the scientific method of theory) while ignoring evidence that disproves the theory, ironically refers to facts while ignoring too many facts to be mentioned, and did not answer the question by recommending an atheist example of the self-ideal etc. etc.

Societal cohesion needs the Christian attributes of justice, love, and mercy to potentially create the freedom necessary for the formation of an advanced civilization. Atheist’s attributes of injustice, hate, and mercilessness are by necessity counter to Christian attributes and must potentially create an enslaved society with the lowest of authoritarian civilization models.

Daisy Grewal, research scientist at Stanford University School of Medicine, wrote about the reality of people not trusting atheists.⁶⁸ The trust matrix for atheists cooperation with the transcendent righteous values of Christians can be seen below with the least likely category of 1,1, explaining why it is irrational for Christians, or even other atheists, to generally trust an atheist.

	                Trust Matrix
	
	                                        Atheist
	                                     (no)   (yes)  
	
	                           (no)     0,0     0,1
	Righteous spirit
	                           (yes)    1,0     1,1   
     

Former CIA employee and NSA computer technology contractor, Edward Snowden was trusted to keep information considered vital to U.S. interests secret. Instead, the self-identified humanist (atheist) chose to reveal them to the world hostile to U.S. freedoms,⁶⁹ u cog (~ ∞k) → u cog (bS ⌐ k). Now exiled in socialist atheist Moscow, the high school dropout is active in a freedom of press foundation. Assuming it to be a reflection of his actual beliefs, Snowden’s biography page on that website states..."In 2013, he revealed the NSA was unconstitutionally seizing the private records of billions of individuals who had not been suspected of any wrongdoing." Many people rationally believe that the U.S. intelligence community’s unlawful surveillance of innocent U.S. citizens needed to be exposed. However, Snowden apparently did it for reasons of ignorance. He indicates he does not understand U.S. constitutional law only applies to the 300 million plus U.S. citizens. The billions of non U.S. citizens throughout the world, spied on by U.S. agencies for national security reasons, were properly sanctioned by U.S. law.

Edward Manning, a former United States Army soldier trusted with U.S. secrets, was convicted by court-martial in 2013 of violations of the Espionage Act and other offenses, after disclosing nearly 750,000 classified and sensitive, military and diplomatic documents to enemies of the freedoms constitutionally guaranteed by the U.S. constitution to its citizens. Captain David Moulton, a Navy psychiatrist, told the court that Manning's facial features showed signs of fetal alcohol syndrome. Typically, fetal alcohol syndrome presents with damage to the prefrontal cortex, which is responsible for executive decision making. But not all people with mental deficiencies choose to reject God.

Many times mental disorder is suspiciously given as an alibi or excuse, compared with Paul’s honest and rational struggle to be righteous in his redemptive matrix model presented earlier. Hamlet told Horatio in Act 1, Scene 5, of Shakespeare’s⁷⁰ Hamlet that he was going "To put an antic disposition on," ⌐ ~ cog u. Later in Act 5, Scene 2, Hamlet said to Laertes, “Give me your pardon, sir. I’ve done you wrong. But pardon ’t, as you are a gentleman. This presence knows, And you must needs have heard, how I am punished With sore distraction. What I have done, That might your nature, honor, and exception Roughly awake, I here proclaim was madness. Was ’t Hamlet wronged Laertes? Never Hamlet. If Hamlet from himself be ta'en away, And when he’s not himself does wrong Laertes, Then Hamlet does it not. Hamlet denies it. Who does it, then? His madness. If’t be so, Hamlet is of the faction that is wronged. His madness is poor Hamlet’s enemy.” Hamlet’s decision to make Claudius believe that he was insane backfired when everyone, except Claudius, was deceived. Polonious recognized that Hamlet's madness was not genuine. Ophelia's madness, however, did not conveniently come and go. Her true madness ended with her suicide, ~ cog u. Using the unredemptive decision model for Saul’s self algorithm, Hamlet’s self-will chose 0,1 and feigned 1,0 to manipulate others for person gain, while Ophelia’s self-will also always choose 0,1 unaware of the importance of feigning 1,0 for personal gain.

In school, Manning was known to remain silent during the part of the Pledge of Allegiance to the U.S. that makes reference to God,⁷¹ ⌐ ~ cog u. Saul’s unredemptive decision model for Manning’s self algorithm would always be 0,1 with the possibility of feigning 1,0, under mentally healthy conditions, when his perception of a situation required deceit. This self-identified atheist and U.S. Democrat flunked out of college after the first semester. It must be a true burden to have the infinite knowledge required to be an actual atheist and have to condescend to the great (Christian) minds of history, presented in part throughout this paper. Having XY chromosomes, Manning now pretends to have female XX chromosomes,⁷² as seen in his attempt at counterfeiting the innately recognizable feminine symmetrical appearance by his disturbingly unsymmetrical masculine appearance innately discernable in the photo of him below, u cog (~ ∞k) → u cog (bS ⌐ k).

Recently, a U.S. school teacher⁷³ and a U.K. medical doctor⁷⁴ were fired because they acknowledged the biological reality of chromosomes and were unwilling to conform to the fantasies of gender dysphoria sufferers. The self-identified atheist and therefore socialist, Franz Kafka is known to have indicated, “By believing passionately in something that still does not exist, we create it. The nonexistent is whatever we have not sufficiently desired.”

Fox News reports Stockholm School of Economics professor and researcher, Magnus Söderlund said he believes eating human meat, derived from dead bodies, might be able to help save the human race. He advocated an anti-Christ belief on Swedish television and at the (2019) Gastro Summit in Stockholm that cannibalism might stop global warming if society were “awaken to the idea” of cannibalism, u cog (~ ∞k) → u cog (bS ⌐ k). In response to Söderlund’s recommendation, a woman on 3 October, 2019, attended a town hall hosted by Democrat New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez at the Queens Public Library in Corona, New York. She demanded that people “start eating babies” in response to climate change. Wearing a t-shirt that read, “Save the Planet, Eat the Children,” her rant declared that there are only "a few months left" and that it is time to "start eating babies.” Tellingly, Cortez could have easily and quickly denounced the woman’s proposal, but chose not to. It was later learned that the woman may have been associated with a Lyndon LaRouchePAC.⁷⁵

Cortez’s views have been so far removed from reality most any view opposing reality may be believed by accepters of reality as her views (see the Axiom of Reality explained earlier). Unless prevented by a black swan event, mathematically, the next step by accepters of reality must be to justly physically eliminate rejecters of reality and prevent the chaos of their self-replication and allow for self-replication of believers in reality before they are themselves unjustly physically eliminated.

The conflict can be expected to intensify when there is tight physical confinement, such as in families, schools, and workplaces, etc. For example in Wellington, Ohio, an unarmed loving Christian pastor and his wife were shot in 2007 by their recently self-identified atheist son, u cog (~ ∞k) → u cog (bS ⌐ k), Daniel Petric, a sixteen year old for removing a video game that promoted evil (Halo 3). After he had murdered his mother, Sue, and had shot his father in the head, Daniel tried to frame his father with gun evidence but was distracted by the arrival of a car. At the police interrogation, Daniel feigned crying as he explained that his father had did the murder, ⌐ ~ cog u. His lie quickly became unraveled and he was sentenced to 23 years to life in prison. The surviving father, Mark, says he has forgiven Daniel.

The mathematics of the cause of a just war asserts,├, the inertia, I, of increasing, ↑, time, t, times the Christian self, cx S, which cannot be parallel, ∦, with the spiritual constant, k, of the antiChrist self, ay S, equals, =, the probability, P, of increased, ↑, force, F, that negates, ⌐, boundaries, ∂, of the equilibrium of reaction direction, ⇌.

Mathematical Just War Formula

├ I (↑t (cx S) ∦k (ay S)) = P (↑F ⌐ (∂ ⇌))

The Thirty-Six Stratagems is a Chinese series of stratagems, by an unknown author, used in civil politics and war. The name of the collection is derived from the Book of Qi (its seventh biographical volume) Biography of Wáng Jìngzé. The number thirty-six was used by Wáng, a general from the Ming dynasty period, to denote numerous stratagems instead of any specific number. His term was reference to the I Ching, where six is the number of Yin⁷⁶ that shares many characteristics involved in military strategy. It has six chapters with six stratagems each. Thirty-six is the square of six and acts as a metaphor for numerous strategies. Those strategies are for predators and not for a Divine right of defense against being murdered in a just war. Used by atheist communist Chinese leaders today, the first strategy of Chapter 1 (Winning Stratagems), is translated to be “deceive the sky.” In the atheist, and therefore communist state, the ‘sky” is their political leader (emperor) who, by necessity, must set their behavioral standards as a god, u cog (~ ∞k) → u cog (bS ⌐ k). Of course, those standards would be adversarial to Divine standards and should be resisted with all force by the redeemed. It is widely known that the coming Antichrist’s number will be 666.⁷⁷ His Satanic strategy, from the murdering `father of lies,⁷⁸ will be deception.⁷⁹ The last strategy 6 of the last Chapter 6 of Thirty-Six Stratagems is “if all else fails retreat to fight again.” The fate of Satan and his followers is eternal defeat in hell.⁸⁰

The U.S. should take special notice during its present time of internal strife. The fifth Chinese strategy of Chapter 1 is translated “loot a burning house.” When a country is beset by internal conflicts, such as disease, crime and corruption, they will be unable to deal with an outside threat. Keep gathering intelligence on that enemy because this is the time to attack. This will be their weakest state so attack without mercy and destroy it, which will prevent future troubles. Allies are to be tricked into fighting your wars, strategy 3 of Chapter 1. Allies are to be borrowed from to attack a common enemy and once defeated that ally is to be attacked with their own borrowed resources, strategy 6 of Chapter 4. Make outright lies out of nothing, strategy 1 of Chapter 2.

Conversely, Fenggang Yang, professor of sociology at Purdue University and author of Religion in China: Survival and Revival Under Communist Rule, received $3.5 million from the John Templeton Foundation to map religious adherents in China. He spoke with the UK’s Telegraph newspaper about his prediction that China’s Christian population would expand to 160 million by 2025 and by 2030 could exceed 247 million, including Catholics. That number would outrank the United States, Brazil, and Mexico as the largest Christian population in the world. Some experts suggest the number of Christians in China is now more than the number of oppressive atheist Communist Party of China members, currently numbered at 88 million.

A believer in God, as was his Lutheran pastor father, Leonhard Euler said to an atheist (materialist philosopher) Denis Diderot,⁸¹ “(a + bⁿ) / n = x, donc Dieu existe” (French for so God exists). He was addressing the “fool factor,” which is the invalid concept of there being no God made by corrupt minds that hate knowledge and can never be wise,⁸² u cog (~ ∞k) → u cog (bS ⌐ k). If you're going to be an atheist, you ought to be a decent mathematician with more than a philosophical bent against reality. If you are a mathematician you can not honestly be an atheist, ⌐ aS├, because God is a mathematician and all, especially logic language and (biological) computer programs, leads to Him. Human life is a series of choices to comply with God’s laws and will (1) or choices to not comply with God’s laws and will (0).⁸³

The prideful wicked persecutes the poor. They boast and bless the covetous. They do not seek God who is rarely in their thoughts. Their ways are grievous. They say they will not have adversity. They are full of cursing, deceit, and fraud. They speak of mischief and vanity. In secret places they murder the innocent. They lie in wait as a lion humbled to catch the poor. They think God will not remember. They believe God will never see their acts. This is a condemnation of the holy God who will judge the fatherless and the oppressed (excerpted from Ps. 10:2-18). Their guilty hearts will know themselves, uS → cog uS.

I think men of science as well as other men need to learn from Christ, and I think Christians whose minds are scientific are bound to study science that their view of the glory of God may be as extensive as their being is capable of. --James Maxwell

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2019 DALLAS F. BELL, JR.